On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 03:22:03PM +0100 Arne Brutschy wrote: > Date: Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 03:22:03PM +0100 > From: Arne Brutschy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: To Marco Menardi > Subject: Re: [Visdn-hackers] Is vISDN dead, and/or is a fork needed?
Hi List, [..] > I guess a fork would make sense, but I doubt that the developing > competence is high enough/we can find enough active developers. > Speaking for myself, I don't have the time nor expertise developing > core isdn stuff. As this list is mostly inactive, I guess there are > not may active/able developers around. Based on the patches submitted > so far, there are only very few people able to cope with the code > complexity. Let's see who responds :) I'm willing to provide debian packaging, not much but let's see how the lists responds with ppl willing to build a ISDN-solution for asterisk/openpbx that is ready for productional use. > M> or if we better go to mISDN instead and leave visdn on > M> it's own. Would be certainly a pity, but I see no more options at the > M> moment. > mISDN is no option for me and all users who are using vISDN with HFC > cards in NT mode (internal S0 bus). The only option for this > functionality is zapHFC, which is really a crappy piece of software. I agree... I'm just looking for a simple solution for my private use at home. I've spend some time with all BRI-solitions for asterisk and the only thing that was acceptable for my limited use at home was mod_capi with a old Fritz!PCI (no NT-mode) but all other solutions crashed sooner or later. Cheers Leif _______________________________________________ Visdn-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.uli.it/mailman/listinfo/visdn-hackers
