Massimo Nuvoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Consider also that a lot of patch have been sent in this mailing list, > none of them are present on the mainstream visdn code. Perhaps there > is a number of sites where is possibile to find a 'patched' version of > the visdn code, this is not my idea of quality, and also this is not a > good image for a GPL project.
Unfortunately this has been the case in Linux ISDN support ever since I started using ISDN some 10 years ago. I would not really expect this to change... > The last recent power on the development of the MISDN driver (thanks > to Digium?) and the fact that also the patches needed to asterisk to > work with visdn are not in the asterisk mainstream code seems to tell > us "hey place this job on the WC and swap to MISDN". Why not? MISDN did not work for me in a very basic TE-Mode setup when I tried to find a usable Asterisk/ISDN solution this summer. As I already said, I consider the misdn Interface not to be very Unix-like. Using tcpdump for D-channel is IMO the greatest thing since sliced bread. What I would really need is Asterisk _and_ rawip support which is unavailable on any Linux ISDN Implementation AFAIK. At the Moment I use vISDN for voice stuff and hisax for rawip which requires a second ISDN-card that would not be necessary with any good ISDN stack. Regards Sven -- "In my opinion MS is a lot better at making money than it is at making good operating systems" (Linus Torvalds, August 1997) /me is [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web _______________________________________________ Visdn-hackers mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.uli.it/mailman/listinfo/visdn-hackers
