Arne Brutschy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mISDN is no option for me and all users who are using vISDN with HFC
> cards in NT mode (internal S0 bus).
mISDN might be an option if it would be at least somewhere near
usable. Last time I checked incomming calls generated a kernel oops.
> The only option for this functionality is zapHFC, which is really a
> crappy piece of software.
Very true! zapHFC does not maintain the BRI-secs and is IMO broken by
design as IRQ-handling is concerned.
Im using ISDN in Linux for more than 10 years now and visdn seemed to
be the very first Implementation which is done the right way. I
always thought about CAPI not beeing very Unix like.
Sven
--
"Thinking of using NT for your critical apps?
Isn't there enough suffering in the world?"
(Advertisement of Sun Microsystems in Wall Street Journal)
/me is [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web
_______________________________________________
Visdn-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.uli.it/mailman/listinfo/visdn-hackers
