On Tuesday, November 27, 2007, at 11:48AM, "Rafael Garcia-Suarez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Note also: we have a couple of patches pending by John Malmberg, one to >cwd.t and one to File::Spec::VMS (if I don't forget any). I think I may >apply them to bleadperl then, if noone objects. Fine by me. As I recall they were pretty short and sweet, so even if they cause trouble it will only be on VMS and quickly identifiable. >It's a bit unfortunate that we have two repositories for PathTools, with >patches going sometimes in one, sometimes in another. We have then to >merge diffs in both directions. In my opinion, PathTools is too >entangled to the core to be developed separately, so I think that the >bleadperl repository should be considered the master one, and the svn >repository should be used mostly for convenience and local branches. I agree with the downside of the way we do it now. The upside
