I see no significant performance differences when using VNC via a cable connection to the Internet to a single cpu PIII 1.4GHz, a dual PIII 1,4GHz or a dual Xeon 2.0GHz.
Angus. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jordan Share" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 1:59 PM Subject: RE: VNC 3.3.7 released > I'm not sure what you mean by "VNC configuration". If you are referring to > the various polling options, then I can say that a 2CPU (4 virtual > processors) 2GHz Xeon box has worse performance than a Celeron 566 with > identical settings, over the same network. > > Since this seems odd to me (that a far faster box has far worse > performance), I had been attributing it to the number of CPUs (our dual-CPU > boxes also have worse performance than a uniprocessor machine, all else > being equal). > > If there are any registry tweaks I can do to get better performance, please > let me know. I'd also be interested in a way to lock the winvnc service to > a single processor (in the hopes that this would alleviate some/all of the > slowness). > > Unfortunately, it seems (from the complete lack of response from > listmembers) that most people don't use VNC on dual-CPU boxes. Can anyone > confirm or deny this slowdown? It's pretty noticable, so if you are using > dual or 4way boxes with VNC, you'd be hard pressed to not realize that it > was slower. > > I'd just like to find out if the slowdown I'm seeing is generally > experienced, or if there is something I can tweak to fix it. > > Thanks, > Jordan > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Behalf Of Dr. James Wez Weatherall > > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:02 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: VNC 3.3.7 released > > > > > > Jordan, > > > > There may be some performance improvement between 3.3.6 and > > 3.3.7, but > > it depends heavily upon your VNC configuration. > > Cheers, > > > > -- > > Dr. Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. - http://www.realvnc.com > > Open Source VNC - Commercial Support & Development > > > > --- > > Does anyone know if: > > "Improved reliability of Windows VNC server on multi-processor systems." > > > > means that the performance doesn't suck on multi-processor systems > > anymore? > > I'd not had problems with the service crashing on me (which > > "reliability" > > connotes, to me anyway), but it is /dog/ slow. > > > > I've installed it on our system, but, alas, it requires a reboot to > > start it > > up again, and it's a production machine, so I can't take it down. > > --- > > _______________________________________________ > > VNC-List mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list > _______________________________________________ > VNC-List mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
