Yes, I believe so. At least, the task manager shows graphs for the performance of 4 cpus (which was very puzzling until I learned of hyperthreading). The performance of VNC is no faster on this machine (in terms of screen updates) than the other servers, neither does it seem slower . The limiting constraint seems to be the speed of my remote connection. The machine itself is impressively fast (well it impressed me, anyway), so the applications themselves run more quickly than similar apps on the other servers. The screen resolution is 1024x768, with 256 colors.
Angus. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jordan Share" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Angus Macleod" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:02 PM Subject: RE: VNC 3.3.7 released > Do you have Hyperthreading turned on on the Xeon box? The difference > between 1 and 2 cpus is not as noticable as the difference between 1 and > "4". > > Jordan > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Angus Macleod [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 4:58 PM > > To: Jordan Share; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: VNC 3.3.7 released > > > > > > I see no significant performance differences when using VNC via a cable > > connection to the Internet to a single cpu PIII 1.4GHz, a dual PIII 1,4GHz > > or a dual Xeon 2.0GHz. > > > > Angus. _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
