On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 00:57, Angus Macleod wrote:
> I see no significant performance differences when using VNC via a cable
> connection to the Internet to a single cpu PIII 1.4GHz, a dual PIII 1,4GHz
> or a dual Xeon 2.0GHz.
> > I'm not sure what you mean by "VNC configuration". If you are referring
> to
> > the various polling options, then I can say that a 2CPU (4 virtual
> > processors) 2GHz Xeon box has worse performance than a Celeron 566 with
> > identical settings, over the same network.
Angus, Jordon,
Thanks for these two data points. Performance of WinVNC is heavily
dependent upon the performance of:
- The graphics/driver in having pixels read *back* from it.
- The network subsystem.
In addition, the polling options affect performance a great deal.
It would be useful to know which precise version of WinVNC you are
running (from the About box), which graphics card & driver version each
machine has, and which network card & driver version each machine has,
which CPU(s) each machine has, and what the WinVNC polling settings are.
Cheers,
--
Dr. Wez @ RealVNC Ltd. - http://www.realvnc.com
Open Source VNC - Commercial Support & Development
_______________________________________________
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
