On Mon May 01, 2006 at 06:08:34PM -0400, MontrealPaul wrote:
> Now, that's odd - When I click "reply" for either John or Alex's
> messages, I get *their* address (munged with "at" instead of "@"), but
> when I reply to yours, Robin, I get "[email protected]" (not sure
> how this will display in the actual posted message, but anyway...)
>
Yes - my client is setting a Mail-Followups-To header, which yours is
obviously using for replying to.
> I've also figured out how to reply via Sneakemail without
> cut-and-pasting, so let's see how this goes. Hopefully, this message
> will be intented within yours, but if it is, we won't yet know if it's
> because of your own reply-to address, or because of my modified
> answering method. Let's see...
>
Both of your last messages look properly threaded to me.
Just one more thing - it's generally considered good netiquette to reply
to posts either at the bottom or interspersed with the previous message
(as here), not at the top. This allows subsequent readers to easily
follow the thread of a conversation. You should also trim out any
redundant lines from the previous post to keep the length down (leaving
enough in to provide the context for the reply). Some mailing lists are
more picky about this than others though - it's usually very relaxed
here.
Cheers,
Robin
--
___
( ' } | Robin Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
/ / ) | Little Jim says .... |
// !! | "He fallen in de water !!" |
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
_______________________________________________
VNC-List mailing list
[email protected]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
