MontrealPaul napisal(a): > While I'm at it, may I offer my two cents (Canadian, but wtv..) > regarding the "netiquette" of having newer material down below: While > it may seem logical, from a top-to-bottom-left-to-right (in our > culture) sense, to have older material at the top, it gets > increasingly annoying to have to scroll down past everyone's 'old > news' to get to the newer stuff, then maybe scroll too far, then have
You forget that - according to the netiquette - when quoting previous posts, one should delete the non-necessary parts and leave only what is absolutely necessary to understand the conversation (as I did just above). And as this material is *necessary*, you aren't expected to scroll down past it... ;-) > truncated. Soooo, IMHO, the newer stuff is best shown first, followed > by the older stuff, if included, where the choice is left to the > reader to continue or not. Like in the example below? ;-) - Because it distorts the natural order of reading. - Why? - Answering at the top of the message. - What's most annoying in the e-mail? Regards, Jaroslaw Rafa [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Spam, wirusy, spyware... masz do6f? Jest alternatywa! http://www.firefox.pl/ --- http://www.thunderbird.pl/ Szybciej. #atwiej. Bezpieczniej. Internet tak jak lubisz. _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [email protected] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
