Any particular reason you can't just use TightVNC? I've been using it for quite a while now and it seems to be every bit as stable as the "official" AT&T version.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Is VNC still being worked on? I have not seen any patches or new releases of VNC coming out of AT&T for almost a year now. Has development on VNC stopped? Or is the project considered complete by now? I was especially hoping for TightVNC to be incorporated into the main codebase. Thanks -- Freddy Jensen, Sr. Computer Scientist, Adobe Systems Incorporated 345 Park Avenue, San Jose, CA 95110-2704, USA, Ph: (408) 536-2869 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], URL: http://www.adobe.com -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: 'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: 'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------
