On Fri, 2001-12-28 at 11:42, Kurt P Lloyd wrote: > It would be best if VNC had an undisputed and active steward > with a recognized base version from which to make enhancements. > It was great that the development of TightVNC was made possible > by the open-source model, but at some point, the proper steward > should recognize good contributions by incorporating them back > into the "official" version. (Maybe we'd then get TightVNC for > Macintosh!!) Is anyone from AT&T Research even on this list?!
The thing is, AT&T has a super fast network, and they only use VNC inside their own buildings. They were nice enough to release it under the GPL, but they have no interest in improving it further - it already does what they need. I have seen people from AT&T post here, but very, very rarely. You can contact them through their website, however. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: 'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------
