This probably makes sense in large installations. At less than $1 per active 911 DID, small installs don't seem worth the effort. I'm more asking for others' opinions that making a statement.
For open floor plan offices, or small offices where basically a scream can be heard, I think that a ring-all group for the return number will satisfy the requirements. I welcome any commentary on that also. Example: Client has a call center of 50 cubicles, with 8 office phones placed in either open desks or offices on the perimeter. The space is small enough to have a slightly loud conversation from one end to the other. We currently have a dedicated callback number that rings every phone. On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 11:18 AM Andy Brezinsky <[email protected]> wrote: > There are a number of ways to do this without having a DID assigned to > each device with address information. A number of systems also assign a > callback number to anyone that dials 911 which tacks up a translation for > that number for a period of time so they can call back the user directly. > > Example onfiguration details for AudioCodes and Sonus with skype can be > seen here: > https://ucvnext.org/2016/03/enhanced-911-in-skype4b-server-and-lync-server-part-4/ > > > On 4/5/19 1:22 AM, Matthew Yaklin wrote: > > That is correct. A DID for every phone and listed by e911. For example in > NH it is law schools have it now days to get their special erate funding. > When they call 911 they see very detailed information about floor, room, > etc.. and the phone can be called back directly. We do it for every > customer that has that specific need. > > Matthew Yaklin > Network Engineer > FirstLight > 359 Corporate Drive │ Portsmouth, NH 03801 > Mobile 603-845-5031 > [email protected] | www.firstlight.net > This email may contain FirstLight confidential and/or privileged > information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are directed > not to read, disclose or otherwise use this transmission and to > immediately delete same. Delivery of this message is not intended > to waive any applicable privileges. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Colton Conor <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, April 4, 2019 8:40:11 PM > *To:* Matthew Yaklin > *Cc:* Jason Kuylen; [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] Hotel Phone > > So if you had e911 per room, that would be quite a bit of e911 charges. > Most hotels I have seen have a 10 to 1 ratio for rooms to phone lines. So a > 100 room hotel gets 10 phone lines from the LEC. Are you saying we would > have to pay bandwidth.com or whomever we got our e911 from a separate > e911 charge per room? Isn't e911 tied to DID? In that case you would need a > DID per hotel room? To actuately say room 302 is on floor 3, and room 302 > for example. > > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 11:21 AM Matthew Yaklin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I imagine you want to make sure E911 information is super accurate with > actual floors and room numbers. Physical address and call back number is > correct. By making that accurate and having the customer sign that phones > cannot move you cover a serious base. Perhaps even a sticker on the phone > saying such would be great to. > > > *Matthew Yaklin* > Network Engineer > *FirstLight* > 359 Corporate Drive │ Portsmouth, NH 03801 > Mobile 603-845-5031 > [email protected] | www.firstlight.net > *This email may contain FirstLight confidential and/or privileged > information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are directed* > *not to read, disclose or otherwise use this transmission and to > immediately delete same. Delivery of this message is not intended* > *to waive any applicable privileges.* > > ------------------------------ > *From:* VoiceOps <[email protected]> on behalf of Jason > Kuylen <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, April 4, 2019 12:08:32 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] Hotel Phone > > > I’ve never heard of any other 911 requirement for hotel or business phones > outside of not have to dial 9 to dial 911, ie 9911. Kari’s Law. > > > > Can anyone provide a link with more information? > > > > Thanks. > > Important/Confidential: This communication and any files or documents > attached to it are intended only for the use of the person(s) or entity to > which it is addressed. It contains information that may be confidential and > exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended > recipient of this communication, you are hereby notified that the copying, > disclosure, distribution, storage, retransmission or other use of this > communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > communication by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and destroy > all forms of this communication (electronic or paper). > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > > > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing > [email protected]https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
