Most if not all of the well accepted science prediction/discoveries were initially predicted by mathematical extensions of existing theory. The Higgs had to be real to make the standard model work. Its all about connecting the dots. The same was true for the neutrino.
Now, science predicts supersymmetry(SS). SS predicts how the 3 forces of nature(weak, strong, EMF) must come together at extremely high temperatures and energies. To the shock and chagrin of science, supersymmetry will not be found by the LHC. LENR provides the real way, an alternative way, that the 3 forces come together at low energies. LENR is a reality the science must eventually deal with in order to move forward to complete the standard model. On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:03 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > That is probably exactly how it works! But I am left wondering why the > scientific community accepts the discovery of the Higgs particle so > readily? This is just one of many claims that have less proof than LENR. > I suspect that there is a major element of "Not Invented Here" occurring as > well. > > Do you think that most people are not capable of thinking with a truly > open mind? I have seen plenty of evidence that this is true. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hauke Hein <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri, Mar 20, 2015 11:54 am > Subject: [Vo]:Am I the only one > > Hi Dave, > Max Planck once said: a new scientific truth does not triumph by > convincing its > opponents and making them see the light, but rather its opponents > eventually > die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. > Hauke >
