Higgs is the opposite of LENR. Higgs is a theory that is weakly confirmed by a ONE big complex fallible instrument and two consanguineous teams. If it was promoting cold fusion, skeptic would bash them in 2 second as deluded friends and observing artifacts through single broken instrument. -> I don't criticize LHC, it is a great project, and they will just detect false positive among great results.
Good example of such good reason to be skeptic on LHC, is Opera. One instruments, the best guys in the room... but a bad fiber as artifact... LENR is a phenomenon, without theory, confirmed by thousands of quite simple and robust instruments and independent teams. when theory face experiments, when simplicity face complexity, theory and complexity always win. 2015-03-20 17:03 GMT+01:00 David Roberson <[email protected]>: > That is probably exactly how it works! But I am left wondering why the > scientific community accepts the discovery of the Higgs particle so > readily? This is just one of many claims that have less proof than LENR. > I suspect that there is a major element of "Not Invented Here" occurring as > well. > > Do you think that most people are not capable of thinking with a truly > open mind? I have seen plenty of evidence that this is true. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hauke Hein <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri, Mar 20, 2015 11:54 am > Subject: [Vo]:Am I the only one > > Hi Dave, > Max Planck once said: a new scientific truth does not triumph by > convincing its > opponents and making them see the light, but rather its opponents > eventually > die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. > Hauke >
