I suspect a lot of scientists file LENR+ under the heading of wishful thinking.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Most if not all of the well accepted science prediction/discoveries were > initially predicted by mathematical extensions of existing theory. The > Higgs had to be real to make the standard model work. Its all about > connecting the dots. The same was true for the neutrino. > > Now, science predicts supersymmetry(SS). SS predicts how the 3 forces of > nature(weak, strong, EMF) must come together at extremely high temperatures > and energies. > > To the shock and chagrin of science, supersymmetry will not be found by > the LHC. LENR provides the real way, an alternative way, that the 3 forces > come together at low energies. > > LENR is a reality the science must eventually deal with in order to move > forward to complete the standard model. > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:03 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> That is probably exactly how it works! But I am left wondering why the >> scientific community accepts the discovery of the Higgs particle so >> readily? This is just one of many claims that have less proof than LENR. >> I suspect that there is a major element of "Not Invented Here" occurring as >> well. >> >> Do you think that most people are not capable of thinking with a truly >> open mind? I have seen plenty of evidence that this is true. >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Hauke Hein <[email protected]> >> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >> Sent: Fri, Mar 20, 2015 11:54 am >> Subject: [Vo]:Am I the only one >> >> Hi Dave, >> Max Planck once said: a new scientific truth does not triumph by >> convincing its >> opponents and making them see the light, but rather its opponents >> eventually >> die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. >> Hauke >> > >
