In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 19 Nov 2010 18:19:38 -0800: Hi, [snip]
"No radioactivity has been found also in the Nickel residual from the process." This by itself would appear to be evidence that the reactions they propose were not those which actually took place. e.g. 26% of Ni is Ni-60. Add a proton and you get Cu-61, which has a half life of 3.33 hours. Quite long enough for residual radioactivity to be easily detected. >The Gamma Scout detector they use has a high threshold for gammas, and they >used lead shielding. They did not show lack of gammas- only that the gammas >did not penetrate the lead. Had the detector been placed on the other side >of the shielding, presumably it could have detected gammas. > >That is my reading, but admittedly it begs the question of why not try to >document gamma radiation. I do not know why they did not do this, except >they have an agenda. > >All that they really 'disproved' was that the nuclear reaction was not due >to neutrons. That was the agenda, apparently. > >They showed substantial transmutation of nickel to copper, so without >neutrons this leaves only the proton or 'virtual neutron' pathway, which >apparently is what they want us to believe. > >Jones > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] > >Quote: >"During experimental tests, continuous controls on the radioactivity levels >in close proximity to the apparatus suitably lead shielded, were performed >by >using a gamma ray detector [6] and three passive neutron bubble detectors >BTbubble [7], one of which for thermal neutrons: no radiation was observed >at levels greater than natural radiation background. No radioactivity has >been >found also in the Nickel residual from the process." > >....yet in the body of the paper they discuss extensively a number of >nuclear >reactions which would produce copious gamma rays. > >They would appear to have experimentally disproved their own theory. > >Furthermore, a pure Mills reaction creating Hydrinos, with no nuclear >reactions >at all would easily account for the energy release, while also explaining >the >lack of ionizing radiation. > >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html > > Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
