In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 28 Nov 2010 07:13:44 -0800: Hi, [snip] >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] > >> ...but they claim they did look and didn't find. > > >Can you point to a specific reference?
I only have the paper itself to go on. Personally, I agree with you that it's a weak paper. Nevertheless, as far as it goes, I think it's better evidence for a Hydrino based reaction than for a nuclear one. > >If you're referring to a passing comment with no data, like "no >radioactivity was detected" then that is of little relevance. [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
