"Give me liberty, or give me death!" -- Patrick Henry


G.W. Bush's motto is:

"Give them liberty, or give them death!"

Harry





Harry

leaking pen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> where did this come from?  and take leadership roles?  please, these
> guys coming back are making vietnam vets look like ex cops.  its a new
> generation of homeless we're creating.  and i find it funny that you
> talk of the lies of one president, without discussing the lies of the
> other.  one lie was about a personal happenstance, one has caused the
> death of over 1000 americans, and the loss of limb of another 10k, and
> the death of 150k iraqis.
> 
> sorry, id prefer the "hippy" lies.
> 
> 
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 07:39:15 -0600, RC Macaulay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The Red feet never lie, the green feet never tell the truth. A green foot
>> need not give any answer, or he may give an answer in the form of a question
>> such as.. why do you ask?.. or any number of others.. A question may be a
>> method of shielding a lie.
>> 
>> A skilled green foot, may in a trial courtroom setting ( or congressional
>> hearing  or a University policy meeting) can tell the truth nine different
>> ways without lying.
>> 
>> My purpose in the start of the thread was a quick study in an ethics theme
>> regarding writing quadradic computing software for ethics. One of the most
>> profound questions ever posed in recorded history on the subject was asked
>> of Jesus by Pilate.. " what is truth"?  Was he lying and knew the truth, or
>> was it because he didn't know?
>> 
>> Watching our government conduct business and the war in Iraq begs the
>> question.. what happens when our soldiers return,, gain maturity and take
>> leadership roles? We see the results of the hippy generation of the Vietnam
>> era personified by Clinton. Will a code of ethics be functional for the
>> emerging body of youth ? Or will they all become like skilled green feet ?
>> Basic and applied research depends on addressing questions of this nature...
>> i.e hot vs cold fusion.
>> 
>> Richard
> 

Reply via email to