----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen A. Lawrence"
I'm lost.... I don't see how this relates to anything that's OU.
H -> h -> H is a zero-sum game, just like everything else in
physics, right?
You are using the "little h" as the hydrino? We usually indicate
that as Hy but anyway according to Mills (who is certainly wrong
on the details of this) the hydrino reaction is not easily
reversible.
However, MAHG is NOT conforming to the Mills' interpretation, but
instead to a modification of the Dirac theory (by way of Hotson)
and according to a reinterpretation of Dirac (the non-Mills
interpretation)- if the "bare proton" modality is "pumping"
disrupting the epo balance at the Dirac interface, the effect is
that the ionization energy of the virtual Ps becomes "caught" on
the dimensional-interface with the result being that a real 3.4 eV
photon (half of the 6.8 IP) is left in our dimension. This is the
signature of ZPE in this interpretation = the 3.4 eV photon. Why
is it not 6.8 instead? Stay tuned.
SL: You can't just keep re-using the same hydrogen, getting
energy out on every cycle,
Yup, you can and that is exactly what is happening here and in the
Naudin experiments, IMHO.
SL: I don't see how any machine based on BLP techniques could be
"self powered" in the sense of producing energy without
consuming fuel.
What did I miss?
You missed the part about
1) Mills is wrong, Dirac (reinterpreted) is correct
2) Moller/Langmuir is similar to BLP but not the same
3) ZPE energy powers the device
4) The signature of ZPE in this device is UV light at the
characteristic 3.4 eV mass/energy
Jones
