One MAJOR theoretical difference between the MAHG and the BLP process is the need for a CATALIST to extract excess energy.
The BLP process is driven by individual atomic hydrogen atoms coming in contact with special CATALYST atoms like helium. According to Mills' CQM theory, the catalyst is ESSENTIAL for extracting vast amounts of energy from the individual atomic hydrogen atoms. According to CQM electron orbit spheres belonging to individual hydrogen atoms shrink as they release predicted packets of stored energy when they come in contact with catalyst atoms. At present, numerous experiments performed at BLP appear to have done a remarkable job of documenting the specific amount of predicted energy that ought to be released as "orbit spheres" allegedly shrink to smaller and smaller "P" states. In the MAHG process, however, NO CATALYST atoms are involved. It appears that individual hydrogen atoms THEMSELVES are directly responsible for the extraction of surrounding vacuum energy. Well...actually the recombination of two atomic hydrogen atoms making molecular hydrogen are involved. No atomic shrinking of the hydrogen atom is involved. No "P" states are needed to drive the energy extraction process. Can the individual hydrogen atoms THEMSELVES be considered "catalysts" when they come in contact with each other? Probably not, according to Mill's CQM theory. It remains baffling to me is why two approaches (BLP vs. MAHG) can on the surface appear so utterly different while simultaneously remaining similar in tantalizing ways. What I can't avoid from my point of view is the fact that BOTH process appear to need INDIVIDUAL atomic hydrogen to drive the energy extraction process. IOW, atomic hydrogen appears to be the essential KEY. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com
