It is a very compelling theory Frank, but I don't
think it works out.

--- Grimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I find myself in this situation with regard to the 
> effect of drop in Beta-atmospheric (B-a) pressure 
> on the strength of the attraction and repulsion of 
> positive and negative charges. I am confident that 
> the explanation I have given is correct, albeit 
> obscenely unorthodox, but I find I have to demand 
> a justification, an explanation, from myself (my 
> own worst critic) as to why. 
> 
> To summarize the situation.
> 
> The repulsive force between like charges is affected
> 
> by the drop in B-a pressure as one enters into a 
> material such as water, steel, concrete, palladium 
> etc.
> 
> The attractive force between unlike charges is 
> unaffected by a change in the B-a pressure as one 
> enters the material.
> 
> So the problem is:
> 
>   ------------------------------------------------
>   Why are repulsive forces affected and attractive 
>   forces not affected by the B-a change?
>   ------------------------------------------------
>     =======================================   
>     !     A TENSILE STRESS THEREFORE IS   !
>     !  MERELY A REDUCTION IN THE AMBIENT  ! 
>     !     COMPRESSIVE STRESS AND THE      !
>     !   CONCEPT OF ACTION AT A DISTANCE   !
>     !        IS NO LONGER REQUIRED        !
>     =======================================
> 
>          .....and that really is the crux of the 
> matter. The force that pushes the like charges 
> apart emanates from those charges - but - the 
> force that pushes the unlike charges together 
> emanates, not from the charges, but from the 
> charges' enveloping environment.
> 
> Let's, give it a name. Lets call it the 
> Gamma-aether, the Gamma-atmosphere (G-a), 
> for we are assuredly dealing with two vastly 
> different levels of the total Aether.
> 
> The need for a Gamma-atmosphere was implicitly 
> recognised in the Southampton paper by 
> designating the familiar atmosphere, the air, 
> as the Alpha-atmosphere (A-a)to both distinguish 
> it from the Beta-atmosphere and to provide for 
> up to 22 more enveloping atmospheres as they 
> become required. <g>
> 
> Now it is not that the change in the B-a pressure 
> does not affect the value of the Gamma atmosphere 
> pressure at all. It does affect it. But the G-a 
> pressure is so bloody enormous that the change 
> brought about by a change in the B-a is negligible. 
> Anybody familiar with calculus will be very 
> familiar with thingees being negligible when 
> they are very small compared with other thingees.
> 
> 
> When the B-a pressure is lowered, as it is 
> in the "FLUID PHASE" reduced B-a pressure of 
> a material such as water or metal, the 
> repulsion between positive charges is reduced. 
> In other words, the Coulomb Barrier between
> positive charges is lowered. This is the 
> essential key to understanding Cold Fusion. 
> 
> And in order to make progress in bringing CF to a 
> commercial product, without blowing oneself up in 
> the process, one would be well advised to take 
> Whitehead's good advice.
> 
>  
> ====================================================

Picture it this way...

I have a spring (coulomb force) seperating 2 steel
plates (protons)
Note that the space between the plates is open to the
surroounding atmosphere and not sealed.
The force required to move the plates closer together
is very precisely calculated in air at 14.7 psi.
Now if I were to place the entire apparatus under
water where the pressure was raised to 100 psi would
it make any difference in the force needed to compress
the spring?  The added pressure acts equally on all
sides of the plates and so cancels out.

Frank, as I understand it you see charge as relative
to the background (beta-aether) rather like
temperature.

If we were to call protons hot at 71 degrees and
electrons cold at 69 degrees then a hydrogen atom
would be neutral at 70 degrees because it averages
out.
however if you seperated the particles / charges,
having 10 electrons @ 69 degrees each on one side of a
wall and 10 protons at 71 degrees each on the other,
the charge imbalance shoud be 20, but the temperature
difference is still only 2 degrees.

IMHO it is the absolute difference in charge rather
than the ratio that is important.

Merlyn
Magickal Engineer and Technical Metaphysicist

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to