|
Edmund Storms wrote..
>All very true, Mike. However, we have two kinds of waste, the spent
Ed.. Many New Orleans scenarios exist on earth including the hideous nightmare at Hanford that even Hollywood would have difficulty surpassing in a horror flick. Those of us that have spent a lifetime in wastewater treatment are painfully aware of the task. This serves as stimuli for our continuing to invest in liquid vortex research. Spending money on research is never a waste of time or resources. Our line of products have been enhanced as a byproduct of the ever learning posture afforded the searcher. For example, while studying a method of supercharging a vortex, we discovered how to better mix a blend of gas/liquid disinfecting chemicals via vacuum induction at + 22 ft water basin head. The search goes on. Perhaps the greatest byproduct of research is the morale booster it affords our employees, It is not the number of medals around one's neck or pinned to the chest that counts. Winning is not a result of success, it is a mind game where all battles are won or lost. Richard Richard |
- Re: CF Suppression? RC Macaulay
- Re: CF Suppression? Mitchell Swartz
- Re: CF Suppression? John Coviello
- Re: CF Suppression? Mitchell Swartz
- Re: CF Suppression? Mitchell Swartz
- Re: CF Suppression? Mike Carrell
- Re: CF Suppression? Michael Foster
- Re: CF Suppression? Edmund Storms
- Re: CF Suppression? Mitchell Swartz
- Re: CF Suppression? Edmund Storms
- Re: CF Suppression? Michael Foster

