Harry Veeder wrote:

> It is just the opposite. Peter Hagelstein asked us to make it clear that
> LENR-CANR is the unofficial site.

This is not evident on lenr-canr home page.

It is too! As I said, every ICCF-10 paper says:

"This paper was presented at the 10th International Conference on Cold Fusion. It may be different from the version published by World Scientific, Inc (2003) in the official Proceedings of the conference."

How much more evident can we make it?

Anyway, that's what Hagelstein asked me to write, and that's what I wrote. If Swartz has a problem with it, he should talk to Hagelstein, not me.

Furthermore, where do you find any indication on the site that it is "official"? We do not say anything like that anywhere. Not a hint of it. We have links to all of the official sites that I know of, and we had one to ICCF10.org for as long as it remained active.

- Jed


Reply via email to