Yes John, an important part of the problem is that our school system TELL rather then encourage FIND. However, that is the fact we have to live with. There are no simple way to make people come and take a look in the telescope. There is a need to convince one person at a time and the failing to do so is rather apparent. Paul's comment above indicates that not even visiting the annual events for believers is convincing about LENR being real. There are plenty of people with trust from the general public that will support any amount of doubt. We certainly need Rossi, regardless if you like or dislike his checkered background. We need him to sell real working and economically sound E-cats. The moment he does there will be a lot of investors trying to become part of this new possibility. I do not care if it is BLP or Rossi but it certainly would make LENR easier to be recognized with a product on the market. On the positive side there are a lot of people pushing the issue. Unfortunately the pushes are poorly organized and all push-vectors are different.
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Paul Breed <p...@rasdoc.com> wrote: > That is a nice result, I personally believe that there is some N in LENR, > and that is as good a demo as any... > > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> MFMP have been sitting on an easily replicated unambiguous experiment: >> gamma rays. >> http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/de/follow/follow-2/347-gamma >> >> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Paul Breed <p...@rasdoc.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> The only way to bring people around is to have an easily replicated >>> unambiguous experiment. >>> .... >>> >>> The people with the most open info seem to get null results: >>> The Martin Fleishman Memorial Project.. open science with no >>> un-ambiguous positive results. >>> >>> >>> >> >
