Axil, You may find a plot of a the resistance during the successful run vs. the control run to be of interest.
http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/exp5resistance.png Best, Jack On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is one interesting type of behavior that I have noticed between the > dummy heat profile calibration runs of the MFMP Dog Bone and the LENR > experiment. This strange behavior is also found in Jack Coles experiment, > > There is a high degree of heat fluctuation in the LENR experiment that > does not occurs in the dummy run. It is almost as if heat is being stored > up before it is eventually released with an overunity supplement at > random intervals as the temperature increases. I take this fluctuation of > temperature to be a sign that LENR is in process during these temperature > fluctuations. > > > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> Energy storage in LENR is not based on chemistry. On the contrary is >>> based on Light matter entanglement. Electron, holes and infrared photons >>> become entangled at x-ray photon energies. >>> >> >> There is no evidence that LENR is a form of energy storage. If it were, >> the calorimeter would show a deficit before the reaction, and the deficit >> would equal the energy production that follows. A calorimeter can measure >> an endothermic reaction as accurately as it measures an exothermic reaction. >> >> Furthermore, with some experiments, there is little time before energy >> production begins. If the energy were being stored up, the deficit would >> have to be far larger than the positive heat production that follows. For >> example, some of Fleischmman and Pons cathodes began producing heat after a >> week with no deficit during the week -- that is, with input balancing >> output during the first week. After heat production began it was continuous >> for up to 3 months at up to 100 W. You would have to cram all 3 months of >> heat production into one week, with a negative energy (endothermic) >> reaction of tens of thousands of watts. That is far larger than the total >> input electrolysis power. It would have to be sucking energy in from the >> whole room, covering everything with frost, I suppose. That is impossible, >> needless to say. >> >> - Jed >> >> >
