The personal home based LENR reactor is not going to sell. But a utility
based high output LENR generator station will be readily accepted by the
utilities. DGT and Rossi are wasting time in developing a home based unit.

Personal power generators are only installed in a few well to do
households. Everybody else uses the GRID. This is true now and into any
foreseeable LENR future.

The future of LENR is a grid based   20 Gigawatt LENR utility power station.

On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:

> Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> *But somebody must lose** in this picture**.** The big question mark:
>> can th**e upcoming** tidal wave** be stopped by OPEC/Big Oil** …** or is
>> it too late for** them**?*
>>
>>  My answer based on history:
>
> No, it cannot be stopped by them, and yet, no, it is not too late. What I
> mean is, if they act now they might slow it down, stop it, or co-opt it,
> but history shows they will probably ignore this development until it is
> far too late. Look at similar examples such as:
>
> The replacement of local passenger railroads by automobiles, circa 1920 -
> 1930.
>
> The replacement of long distance passenger trains and ocean liners by
> airplanes 1945 - 1960. This led to the final collapse of the Pennsylvania
> Railroad, which was the biggest and most powerful corporation on earth in
> 1920.
>
> The replacement of mainframe and minicomputers by personal computers,
> software, and by MPP small computers such as the Googleplex, 1980 - 2000.
> This bankrupted DEC, Data General and it almost bankrupted IBM, which was
> an astounding turn of events.
>
> The destruction of the steel industry and the recent bankruptcy of GM,
> both caused in part by legacy problems such as large numbers of retirees.
> This problem was entirely foreseeable, but it is hard to think of a way it
> might have been circumvented.
>
> There are many less well known examples. Very often, the most powerful and
> prosperous corporations in one era have been destroyed in 10 or 20 years by
> changes in the marketplace or by new technology. The usual narrative is
> that the new technology was unforeseen, but in fact, if you read accounts
> of these eras, in most cases the new technology was widely predicted, and
> in some cases it was even invented by the companies it later destroyed. The
> IBM PC is a good example.
>
> If, today, a power company or an oil company were to invest in cold fusion
> and bring it to fruition, I have no doubt this would end up destroying that
> company. But they might not agree with me, so they might do it. If you had
> told an IBM executive in 1980 that the contract they just negotiated with a
> two-bit company called Microsoft for a minor product -- an operating system
> -- would nearly bankrupt the company in the 1990, that executive would
> think you are crazy.
>
> The book "The Black Swan" is full stories of events that supposedly came
> out of left field and surprised the experts. The author is wrong. Most of
> the ones relating to technology did not come out of left field, and did not
> surprise the experts. Most of them did not surprise me, personally. I knew
> more about some of these developments when they happened than the author
> does now, and I spotted several mistakes in the book. Complete surprises
> are rare in technology. Cold fusion was a complete surprise, but after 1991
> it was obvious that it might become a practical source of energy. If it
> does, people who are surprised will have only themselves to blame. They
> should have paid attention, and they should have stopped inventing
> ridiculous reasons to deny the facts. History shows that the people running
> oil companies and the like will probably not look closely or take the
> technology seriously until it is too late.
>
> It will be too late when the public becomes aware of the fact that cold
> fusion is real and that in the near term it has the potential to save every
> person thousands of dollars a year. Once that becomes generally known, no
> power on earth will be able to stop the research, development and
> deployment of cold fusion. People such as the Koch brothers will spend
> billions of dollars trying to stop it with PR campaigns and by buying
> Members of Congress, but they will overwhelmed by a tsunami of public
> opinion.
>
> - Jed
>
>

Reply via email to