IMHO, The LENR reaction is produced by nano particles. Any chemical compound that when heated produce nano particles (dusty plasma) will be LENR active to some extent.
Even an electric arc as in Mizuno's experiment will produce nano particles from pure elements like nickel. An exploding metal foils in water will produce metal nano particles thus generation LENR activity. A laser blasting a metal will produce LENR activity in water is the Laser frequency and the metal are matched based on reflectivity. Cavitation produces LENR activity when collapsing cavitation bumbles produce solid water nanoparticles from plasma. On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Since *Calcium hydroxide* seems to be LENR active as a secret sauce, I > would like to recommend for lower temperature experimentation that jack > Cole is doing trying relatively safe potassium compounds as follows: > > Potassium hydroxide > Potassium carbonate > > Potassium has a lower melting and boiling point than calcium hydroxide and > Lithium hydroxide and may also produce nano particles at elevated > temperature. > > The process that might make the LENR reaction work is nano particle > production when selected chemical compounds are heated. > > A systematic experimental survey of hydride (dangerous), hydroxide, and > cachinnate compounds might produce detectable LENR activity. > > I only recommend hydride compounds for those who can handle these > dangerous chemicals safely. > > I also would recommend an electric arc as a way to produce nano particles > since the temperature produced by the arc is 20,000C which is hot enough to > turn any compound into a plasma. > > > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> *From:* David Roberson >> >> >> >> Ø It is truly amazing that my model can take the input coolant >> temperature, ambient temperature, and pulse power magnitude and timing as >> inputs and generate a virtually flat line in simulated coolant temperature >> once the noise sources are subtracted from the measured coolant input data… >> Once the balance is disrupted by excess power, I can add that back to the >> input signal so that balance is again restored. The addition is an >> accounting of the excess energy that the device generates. With this >> system I can detect an addition of approximately 1000 joules of excess >> energy per pulse. >> >> >> >> Dave, I think your expertise in modeling could be invaluable to Jack Cole >> and others, and I agree that he is not ready for prime time yet. Stand by, >> since things could move fast in the next few months. Any of the >> improvements mentioned in previous post could bump the gain in the simple >> system to COP= 2, assuming that the operative reactions is scalable, which >> we almost have to assume, given Rossi/Parkhomov’s claimed results. >> >> >> >> Jones >> >> >> > >
