I wrote:
> I have no idea why J. T. Vaughn said what he said, but I expect he did say > it. I do not think he is the sort of person who lies. Perhaps they are fed > up with Rossi? > I do not know who said what to whom, but let's go over this statement again: "Mr JT Vaughn stated .. that Mr Rossi did not appear credible (paraphrase)" Imagine an inspector from the State of South Carolina were to call me on the phone and ask: "regarding this fellow Rossi, does he have any credibility with the scientific mainstream?" I would say "no, he doesn't." I might add that he has not published anything, he says controversial things, and he has a checkered past. I think it is obvious to anyone that he does not appear credible. I think some of Rossi's claims are probably true. Others I think are exaggerated or mistaken. He certainly has a credibility problem. I was hoping the second Elforsk test would settle the issue once and for all but unfortunately I do not think it has. If Vaughn said something like that, I don't see how anyone can criticize it. - Jed
