I contacted David Crowley, Manager of the Radioactive Materials Branch at N.C. Department of Health and Human Services, and asked a few questions about the document published by GW.
Here’s his answer: - - - - - Mr. Lewan, The report posted to www.freeenergyscams.com<http://www.freeenergyscams.com> is in fact a copy of an original report from my office. Please note that the allegation number should be labeled 2015-01 instead of 2014-01 because the investigation was the first one finalized in 2015. Anything stated within the report findings was in context to an allegation investigation of radioactive material being utilized in North Carolina. The investigators documented what was said and observed. They reported what was communicated to them by Mr. Vaughn, but left out additional descriptive language that followed the statement of credibility. We have no further information to share about the alleger. Thank you for your inquiry. David Crowley N.C. Department of Health and Human Services Manager, Radioactive Materials Branch – Division of Health Service Regulation 5505 Creedmoor Rd, First Floor, Raleigh, NC 27612 1645 MSC, Raleigh NC 27699-1645 Phone: 919-814-2303 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> www.ncradiation.net<http://www.ncradiation.net> www.ncdhhs.gov/dhsr/<http://www.ncdhhs.gov/dhsr/> - - - - Mats www.animpossibleinvention.com<http://www.animpossibleinvention.com> Från: Ian Walker [mailto:[email protected]] Skickat: den 5 februari 2015 19:20 Till: [email protected] Ämne: Re: [Vo]:Investigation by NC Department of Health into IH/Rossi/Vaughn/etc Hi all As has been noted on Ecatworld in a post by US_Citizen71 http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/02/04/rossi-responds-to-publication-of-inspection-report/ and as many thought from the disjointed ambiguous and odd phrasing in the letter as well as missing pages, the letter appears to be a Photoshop job. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxCBtZoq-VqLd1VOd3dVS2pRWGM/view Kind Regards walker On 5 February 2015 at 16:03, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I wrote: I have no idea why J. T. Vaughn said what he said, but I expect he did say it. I do not think he is the sort of person who lies. Perhaps they are fed up with Rossi? I do not know who said what to whom, but let's go over this statement again: "Mr JT Vaughn stated .. that Mr Rossi did not appear credible (paraphrase)" Imagine an inspector from the State of South Carolina were to call me on the phone and ask: "regarding this fellow Rossi, does he have any credibility with the scientific mainstream?" I would say "no, he doesn't." I might add that he has not published anything, he says controversial things, and he has a checkered past. I think it is obvious to anyone that he does not appear credible. I think some of Rossi's claims are probably true. Others I think are exaggerated or mistaken. He certainly has a credibility problem. I was hoping the second Elforsk test would settle the issue once and for all but unfortunately I do not think it has. If Vaughn said something like that, I don't see how anyone can criticize it. - Jed
