Crazy! On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Ian Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all > > As has been noted on Ecatworld in a post by US_Citizen71 > > http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/02/04/rossi-responds-to-publication-of-inspection-report/ > and as many thought from the disjointed ambiguous and odd phrasing in the > letter as well as missing pages, the letter appears to be a Photoshop job. > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxCBtZoq-VqLd1VOd3dVS2pRWGM/view > > Kind Regards walker > > > On 5 February 2015 at 16:03, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I wrote: >> >> >>> I have no idea why J. T. Vaughn said what he said, but I expect he did >>> say it. I do not think he is the sort of person who lies. Perhaps they are >>> fed up with Rossi? >>> >> >> I do not know who said what to whom, but let's go over this statement >> again: >> >> "Mr JT Vaughn stated .. that Mr Rossi did not appear credible >> (paraphrase)" >> >> Imagine an inspector from the State of South Carolina were to call me on >> the phone and ask: "regarding this fellow Rossi, does he have any >> credibility with the scientific mainstream?" I would say "no, he doesn't." >> I might add that he has not published anything, he says controversial >> things, and he has a checkered past. I think it is obvious to anyone that >> he does not appear credible. >> >> I think some of Rossi's claims are probably true. Others I think are >> exaggerated or mistaken. He certainly has a credibility problem. I was >> hoping the second Elforsk test would settle the issue once and for all but >> unfortunately I do not think it has. >> >> If Vaughn said something like that, I don't see how anyone can criticize >> it. >> >> - Jed >> >> >
