-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Cook
Jones-- Look at the physics of nuclear magnetic resonance. Spin energy
states are changed in nuclei with the introduction of a magnetic field and a
EM photon.
Yes, Bob - we both have espoused spin as an active mechanism, but it is
doubtful in the full analysis to be the only active mechanism. NMR is very
low energy as you observe ("commercial NMR the energies are small, one spin
quanta" ) and not gainful. And it would be easy to capture the accompanying
RF signal if it was there for Parkhomov. I hope you are saying that this is
only an analogy and the signal is not RF but expresses itself as IR ? If so
- then what is the ultimate source of gain? We could be on the same page.
> However, there is no reason why higher spin quanta cannot be involved,
with many particles of the nano coherent
systems accepting small quanta, all adding up to MeV'S of accepted energy
for any given reaction.
If this kind of scale-up is possible, then it is a surprise that it has
never been demonstrated, merely to show that it is doable. Yet I agree that
spin conversion would solve a multitude of issues, if it can be shown to be
valid. Yet one still needs to pinpoint where mass is converted into energy.
It cannot involve gamma radiation.
In the past, I have proposed that protons can have extra mass on average,
and that would work, but then why is lithium required? (or is it required?)
Lithium, and particularly Li6 is now looking like the key parameter in all
of this.
Jones
