Blaze- Disregard previous numbers. I’ll try to calculate the internal pressure
at day 30 another way. The point remains that if lithium fusion is responsible
for the gain, lots of helium needs to have been produced and the reactor
probably could not have tolerated the pressure.
From: Blaze Spinnaker
Ø Jones, it is possible that helium was observed and was originally discounted
as error. That happens.
Not when this much claimed energy has been seen.
Think about the implications. The Lugano experiment supposedly generated 2 kW
excess for 30+ days. This is about 10^28 eV equivalent. If all this energy was
coming from helium, as a result of lithium fusion, at 16 MeV a pop, then it
amounts to several moles of gas. A mole of helium fills about 25 liters at room
temp - so this would have been about 50 liters of helium. Even if they
overestimated the gain by a factor of 10, and the excess was 200 watts, the
reactor could not have survived the internal pressure.
Anyway – the Lugano report was supposed to be a scientific paper. You do not
discount or hide anything – you report and let the chips fall where they may.
It is highly improbably that lithium fusion to helium is the power source
behind this reactor, but it looks like pure Li-6 was intentionally added to
natural LAH. That narrows the possibilities.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Surprise,
surprise.
Fresh on the heels of a paper which suggests that lots of helium should have
been found, Rossi suddenly reveals that yes, we found it but are just now
taking the opportunity to reveal that we found it.
http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/04/08/rossi-helium-found-in-e-cat-reaction/
I do not believe this new revelation is credible, based on the appearance of
the paper and the timing, since he has never before said that helium was
discovered.
The guy is desperate for credibility.
