-----Original Message-----

> The argument can be made that there was NEVER enough lithium present in
the Lugano reactor to provide the reported net energy gain (1.5 MW-hrs) over
32 hours- even if 100% of the lithium was consumed and converted into
helium.

For the record - The total Lugano Fuel sample had a reported mass of 1 gram.

Element % by Weight
Nickel 55.0
Iron 39.0
Aluminum 4.3
Lithium 1.1
Hydrogen (no Deuterium) 0.6
Total 100.0

Therefore, there was .011 grams of lithium at the start. The average mass of
the lithium = 6.93 amu or 7 grams per mole = .0016 moles. If all of this
lithium, 100%, had fused with protons, giving 17 MeV per fused lithium atom,
then it would have been marginally sufficient to provide the energy reported
(10^28 eV). That assumes that every atom has been consumed - and assuming
that no energy was lost to x-ray radiation. BUT. 

.there was lots of lithium left over in the ash, so all of it could not have
reacted and possibly as much as 90% of the bremsstrahlung should have been
lost in an alumina reactor.

As for the argument that 8 MeV alpha particles produce bremsstrahlung which
is mostly thermalized, consider the case of Uranium decay. 

U is an alpha emitter, where the alpha has an average kinetic energy of only
5 MeV, yet this corresponds to a velocity which is 5% of the speed of light
producing substantial radiation, and despite the extremely high ability of U
to absorb such radiation - hundreds of times greater than alumina, most of
it escapes - which is why even small pitchblende samples make the Geiger
counter go wild. It is likely that only a few percent of 8 MeV alpha
bremsstrahlung will be completely thermalized by alumina absorption, since
alumina is fairly transparent to x-rays in this range. IOW most of that
putative 8 MeV should be lost as x-rays and not recorded as heat.

In short, I am having a hard time imagining how Cook and Rossi can believe
that lithium proton fusion is responsible for the energy gain - even if
there is a spin mechanism which bypasses the problem of x-rays from
bremsstrahlung.

Reply via email to