In reply to  Jones Beene's message of Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:50:39 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] 
>In reply to  Bob Higgins's message:
>
>>How it is implicated at a Pd cathode is a mystery
>
>.... It should occasionally be reduced to the atomic Li at the cathode, but
>is unlikely to last long enough to plate out. It is a highly reactive metal,
>and will readily react with a water molecule. However, should a Lithium atom
>both be reduced as a neighbour of a Hydrogen atom at the cathode, then there
>is a possibility for the Li to catalyze Hydrino shrinkage in the H (D). 
>
>Robin,
>
>That is close to what I was going to add - since the first ionization of Li
>is 5.39 eV and the second is 75.64 eV. 
>
>Together these add up to 81.02 eV. In terms of Rydberg energy - 27.2 eV x 3
>= 81.6 eV. Which is a very close fit for lithium, but of course, that last
>electron does not come off easily and that is where nickel may come into
>play (as opposed to palladium). Palladium has only a low energy fit but
>nickel has a unique ionization situation vis-à-vis lithium. 
>
>I'm not sure how this happens in detail but nickel has an IP5 which is
>almost identical to the one of lithium - IP2. Perhaps the lithium and the
>nickel interact first, leaving lithium with the deep "hole" that otherwise
>would not be there at low temperature;

Your understanding of the term "hole" is not correct. A hole is not a place
where electrons are missing. It is a place into which energy can be dumped. And
energy can be dumped when electrons are *present*, because dumping the energy
into the neutral atom removes the electrons from the atom, i.e. causes the atom
to become ionized.

Hence the Li atom (not ion) acts as a catalyst because it needs 81.02 eV to
become ionized to Li++. And as you point out here above, 81.02 is a "close"
match for 81.6 eV, which the H just happens to want to get rid of.

I wonder if this "energy resonance" is analogous to what happens in a Tesla coil
between primary and secondary?

In short nothing extra (i.e. Ni etc.) is needed for this shrinkage reaction to
happen. Just H atoms and Li atoms in close proximity. However the Ni likely
plays a role in two ways. First, as you have also frequently pointed out, it is
a spillover catalyst, hence increasing the number of H atoms likely to be
available. Secondly, it may well play a role in any ensuing nuclear reactions,
due to the large change in binding energy when a nucleon is added to the
nucleus, since it is close to the top of the binding energy curve (as you have
also pointed out many times ;).
Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

Reply via email to