How do we create a dummy for comparison to get a baseline of the RF production without LENR in progress?
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]> wrote: > Years ago when I built a sonoluminescence apparatus and was investigating > its properties, I read of some systems that used alpha particles and > neutrons to stimulate bubbles which would migrate to the acoustic field > center. So, generally, alpha, neutrons, and protons may stimulate a bubble > in water. Bubble Tech uses this property to stimulate a persistent bubble > in a different fluid for neutron detection. In an electrolytic cell, > whenever a bubble forms it briefly changes the resistance of the cell, but > because bubbles can form so rapidly, it can appear as a step change in > resistance. Since the bubbles form at random, it creates noise in the cell > resistance. When LENR occurs, the emitted charged particles cause rapid > bubble formation and hence an increase in the bubble noise in the cell > resistance. This bubble noise will show up as a broadband spectrum in the > voltage across the cells - becoming a conducted RF. Local propagating RF > radiation can also occur from the step change in the current flow paths as > the current restructures to flow around the bubble. This is not surprising. > > As Terry asks, what is the spectrum? If the spectrum is broadband, the > cause is probably this bubble noise. If there are narrow bandwidth > spectral components, that would be more interesting. > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Terry Blanton <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Many experimenters are reporting RF as output of there experiments. >>> Could this RF interfere with proper reactor control? >>> >> >> This is the key to the nature of the reaction. Do we have a spectral >> analysis of the emissions? >> > >
