The way to start the LENR reaction is through the production of nanoparticles. There are standard inductry methods used to produce nanoparticles that the LENR experimental community is fumbling with currently using trial and error.
This looks like the way DGT produced their reaction. Pulse power is an industry standard method used to poduce nanoparticles. Dirty power produces nanoparticles by using power pulsation. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ben/cnano/2014/00000010/00000001/art00005?crawler=true Abstract: Polycrystalline copper nanoparticles were synthesized from copper chloride dihydrate solution using the liquid phase plasma reduction method. A bipolar pulsed power supply with tungsten electrodes was used to generate discharge in the aqueous solutions. While large size of dendrite-shaped copper nanoparticles were mostly observed in the initial stage and particle size decreased with discharge time. The particles were dispersed with less and less small particles by the addition of CTAB and anisotropic shapes nanoparticles were mostly observed at long time plasma-treated with high concentration of surfactant. Many spots could be seen in the selected area diffraction pattern (SADP) for polycrystalline particles. ------------------------------- Another way to produce nanoparticles are through cold plasma. RF or Non arcing high voltage produces nanoparticles in gas. http://www3.aiche.org/proceedings/Abstract.aspx?PaperID=38270 On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < [email protected]> wrote: > Axil, what's the frequency of this modulating temperature order of one > Hz?, That's surely AC, but that is slowly moving > and the generated B field from this is less of an importance then that > generated from 50Hz and above. So varying the DC > whithin HZ should be fine. Also you can make sure the resistance is higher > in the slowly varying DC line reducing the impact > on the magnetic field even further. > > Axil, I would actually like to go through the movies and listen to the > bursts of the geiger meeter, and also put a number of the > size of the burst. Then look in what phase the burst is taken place, say > divided it into 2 phases. Then if you define 2 phases > one hypothetical phase with high probability of burst and a low one, You > can do a sign rank test and statistically try to find if > there is a pattern that differs from background radiation. Of cause we'e > heard the data, so we could choose the one that sounds > interesting, maybe a bon feroni correction of 10 would be fine here. So we > would put the limit to 0.005 (bon ferroni correction) for > the 5% level. > > Cheers! > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The production of nanoparticles witch is critical in LENR requires a >> varying pressure and temperature profile arounf the supercritical >> transition point in the gas envelope. A varying input power profile will >> give that varying temperature and pressure profile. >> >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Mr. S. I. Tampe wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> <<Yes, note parkhomov seam to indicate that the form of the applied ac >>> is important. Hence if you take that at face value the conclusion is that >>> induced varying magnetic field is important. Why couple that with the >>> heating. Much better to decouple and search for optimal stimulation in the >>> test at each level of heat.>> >>> >>> I agree with this idea to separate the parameters that or thought to be >>> important and learn about what effects the reaction. >>> >>> Bob Cook >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Den 17 apr 2015 00:11 skrev "Bob Higgins" <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> By 300C, and in the presence of the released H2, the Ni particles have >>>> been reduced of their oxice and are sintered together into a spongy solid. >>>> It remains this way until the LiH and Al have melted, and then the web of >>>> SOLID spongy Ni is coated with a liquid film of LiH-Al . The Ni is solid >>>> and is not going to stir, however, it may be possible to get motion of the >>>> liquid LiH-Al metal. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Heya Vortexuses, >>>>> >>>>> Any thoughts about my shallow thoughts about the parghomov/Ecat setup, >>>>> >>>>> When it comes to steel making, one often has a magnetic stirrer to >>>>> even out the temperature in the mold, hence improving the quality of the >>>>> final product. This works by the magnetic varying field induces current >>>>> that interacts with the magnetic field and induces a force see. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.sinfo-t.jp/eng/stirrer/principle.htm >>>>> >>>>> What I'm wondering is if the fuel inside the ECAT at those high >>>>> temperatures might be stirred by the alternating current. If the stirring >>>>> is the key, then the frequencies does not need to be especially high. >>>>> Parkhomov seam to say that the waveform can have high derivatives from >>>>> time >>>>> to time which might >>>>> >>>>> translate into a "kick" of the right magnitude that might be positive >>>>> for getting it to stir properly. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not sure that the magnitude of this force is in the right ballpark >>>>> to do anything good though. >>>>> >>>>> Another possibility is the following. Powder is a kind of fluid, but >>>>> if you kick it internally and stir it with a magnetic stirrer with kicks >>>>> you may make it more fluffy and more fluid like, that can be beneficial, >>>>> this will surely reduce conductivity though making the stirring effect >>>>> less >>>>> prominent, I see lots of options to vary dimensional properties and powder >>>>> properties, frequencies etc to get the most optimal setting. >>>>> >>>>> Also a good question, can one decouple the heating from the stirring >>>>> (if it indeed can be stirred)? >>>>> >>>>> Hmm, wind with two wires in a double helix, one with low resistance >>>>> (low heating) thicker, higher conductivity etc, and the usual one to heat. >>>>> Maybe there will be problems with magnetic coupling between the wires, but >>>>> surely the setup is less coupled then using just one wire. >>>>> >>>>> Another better possibility is to heat with DC and stir with AC. One >>>>> should then try to decrease the resistance in the wire as much as possible >>>>> in order to heat less with the AC and get more stiring/manipulating >>>>> power/freedom out of it if needed. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers! >>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >
