Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: Not to me... >
Ah, but to me, to Gamberale, and to many others, this indicates Defkalion saw no heat. You disagree. But I have not heard your reasons; I doubt you know as much about these tests as Gamberale does; and Gamberale's description fits the data I saw, especially the erratic flow rates. So I discount your opinion. The fact that Defkalion has disappeared also indicates they did not have excess heat. It isn't proof, but it is an indication. Gamberale's report is proof. It is the best evidence you can ask for. In fact, it is the only evidence. As far as I know, no other quantitative descriptions of Defkalion's tests were ever published. There were some theory papers and some descriptions of the equipment, but no actual experimental results. - Jed
