in business and game theory, the fact that DGT got silent after such strong accusation , that the CTO changed job, the manager of international development resigned immediately, and nothing happened anymore, is an evidence much stronger than calorimetry.
question now is if there was some tiny insufficient reaction, or nothing. better forget that tragic story, and focus on what works or may work. 2015-04-21 23:45 GMT+02:00 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>: > Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > Not to me... >> > > Ah, but to me, to Gamberale, and to many others, this indicates Defkalion > saw no heat. You disagree. But I have not heard your reasons; I doubt you > know as much about these tests as Gamberale does; and Gamberale's > description fits the data I saw, especially the erratic flow rates. So I > discount your opinion. > > The fact that Defkalion has disappeared also indicates they did not have > excess heat. It isn't proof, but it is an indication. Gamberale's report is > proof. It is the best evidence you can ask for. In fact, it is the only > evidence. As far as I know, no other quantitative descriptions of > Defkalion's tests were ever published. There were some theory papers and > some descriptions of the equipment, but no actual experimental results. > > - Jed > >
