There is a view arount in quantum physics that time does not exist on the atomic level. Time may be a consequence of entangelment of particles. In the macro world in which we live, gravitation distroys entanglemet since an entangled particle when it moves far from its entangled partners will be rendered decoherent. Time will advance for this far ranging wonderer due to the changes imposed on the particle by gravity. Gravity is the force that shapes the world in which we live.
Time speeds up close to the earth because gravity is stronger there but time increases when the particle is moved farther from the earth. Ashby, Neil (2003). "Relativity in the Global Positioning System" <http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2003-1/download/lrr-2003-1Color.pdf> ). *Living Reviews in Relativity <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_Reviews_in_Relativity>* *6*: But when the system of particles remains withing the same small local volume, time does not flow, it may even run backward and undue events that has already occured. The take away, Special relitivity may not be applicable to interactions between atoms and subatonic particles. On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Roarty, Francis X < [email protected]> wrote: > Matt, > > The fields are all quickly starting to grow together..[snip] lithium ions > to chemically break the metal oxide catalyst into smaller and smaller > pieces."Breaking down metal oxide into tiny particles increases its surface > area and exposes lots of ultra-small, interconnected grain boundaries that > become active sites for the water-splitting catalytic reaction," [/snip] > lithium and nickel may be a super activator in the dogbone as well ..making > the powder particles and any oxides smaller, and Jones has trotted out iron > as one of the possible candidates for the secret sauce. > > Way back when I first came to vortex I trotted out the idea that hydrinos > are actually relativistic like the 05 paper by Jan Naudts suggested and > that the effect could be NESTED to the point where hydrogen loads into > supressive cavities smaller than the hydrogens own atomic size [TARTUS like > :_)] from the external observers perspective while appearing normal to > their own local but time dilated observer. I think these effects normally > self destruct in the presence of oxides but this latest discovery is > activated in situ by the lithium while submerged which sounds like the same > process occurring in the dogbone when the lithium wets the reactor walls. > It is also why I am convinced these tests have to brought online with > matched drives and heat sinking to exploit OU ….to quote the song “you aint > seen nothing yet” I believe most of these destroyed reactors represent self > destructs with far higher COP than we have time to harness ..seems to me we > need better- faster heat sinking before we even learn how much power is > really under the hood! > > Fran > > > > > > *From:* Mats Lewan [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Thursday, June 25, 2015 7:29 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Single-catalyst water splitter from Stanford > produces clean-burning hydrogen 24/7 > > > > http://news.stanford.edu/news/2015/june/water-splitter-catalyst-062315.html > > > > (No big surprises). > > > > Mats > > www.animpossibleinvention.com > > >
