How gtavity causes time to slow down. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose_interpretation
Gravity delays the transition between entrangles and decoherent states. It is this destrution of coherence that results in the arrow of time. In a BEC time stands still. When a BEC is detroyed, time accelerates. On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Clocks on the Space Shuttle <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle> ran > slightly slower than reference clocks on Earth, while clocks on GPS > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPS> and Galileo > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_(satellite_navigation)> satellites > run slightly faster.[1] > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation#cite_note-Ashby-1> Such time > dilation has been repeatedly demonstrated (seeexperimental confirmation > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation#Experimental_confirmation> > below), > for instance by small disparities inatomic clocks > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_clocks> on Earth and in space, even > though both clocks work perfectly (it is not a mechanical malfunction). The > laws of nature are such that time itself (i.e. spacetime > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime>) will bend due to differences > in either gravity <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity> or velocity > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velocity> – each of which affects time in > different ways.[2] > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation#cite_note-HSWTime-2>[3] > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation#cite_note-EdLu-3> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There is a view arount in quantum physics that time does not exist on the >> atomic level. Time may be a consequence of entangelment of particles. In >> the macro world in which we live, gravitation distroys entanglemet since an >> entangled particle when it moves far from its entangled partners will be >> rendered decoherent. Time will advance for this far ranging wonderer due >> to the changes imposed on the particle by gravity. Gravity is the force >> that shapes the world in which we live. >> >> Time speeds up close to the earth because gravity is stronger there but >> time increases when the particle is moved farther from the earth. >> >> Ashby, Neil (2003). "Relativity in the Global Positioning System" >> <http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2003-1/download/lrr-2003-1Color.pdf> >> ). *Living Reviews in Relativity >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_Reviews_in_Relativity>* *6*: >> >> But when the system of particles remains withing the same small local >> volume, time does not flow, it may even run backward and undue events that >> has already occured. >> >> The take away, Special relitivity may not be applicable to interactions >> between atoms and subatonic particles. >> >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Roarty, Francis X < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Matt, >>> >>> The fields are all quickly starting to grow together..[snip] lithium >>> ions to chemically break the metal oxide catalyst into smaller and smaller >>> pieces."Breaking down metal oxide into tiny particles increases its surface >>> area and exposes lots of ultra-small, interconnected grain boundaries that >>> become active sites for the water-splitting catalytic reaction," [/snip] >>> lithium and nickel may be a super activator in the dogbone as well ..making >>> the powder particles and any oxides smaller, and Jones has trotted out iron >>> as one of the possible candidates for the secret sauce. >>> >>> Way back when I first came to vortex I trotted out the idea that >>> hydrinos are actually relativistic like the 05 paper by Jan Naudts >>> suggested and that the effect could be NESTED to the point where hydrogen >>> loads into supressive cavities smaller than the hydrogens own atomic size >>> [TARTUS like :_)] from the external observers perspective while appearing >>> normal to their own local but time dilated observer. I think these effects >>> normally self destruct in the presence of oxides but this latest discovery >>> is activated in situ by the lithium while submerged which sounds like the >>> same process occurring in the dogbone when the lithium wets the reactor >>> walls. It is also why I am convinced these tests have to brought online >>> with matched drives and heat sinking to exploit OU ….to quote the song “you >>> aint seen nothing yet” I believe most of these destroyed reactors represent >>> self destructs with far higher COP than we have time to harness ..seems to >>> me we need better- faster heat sinking before we even learn how much power >>> is really under the hood! >>> >>> Fran >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Mats Lewan [mailto:[email protected]] >>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 25, 2015 7:29 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Single-catalyst water splitter from Stanford >>> produces clean-burning hydrogen 24/7 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> http://news.stanford.edu/news/2015/june/water-splitter-catalyst-062315.html >>> >>> >>> >>> (No big surprises). >>> >>> >>> >>> Mats >>> >>> www.animpossibleinvention.com >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
