If LENR is a factor in the way entanglement occurs, then LENR may be a tool in the minipulation of gravity and time.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > David Deutsch <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Deutsch>, from Oxford’s > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_University> Centre for Quantum > Computation <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centre_for_Quantum_Computation>, > endorses the many worlds theory. He dismisses Penrose's interpretation as > "based more on aesthetics than science", as no experimental anomalies have > been observed.[2] > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose_interpretation#cite_note-Discover-2> > However, > Penrose has responded that if his prediction is true, no experiments have > been performed at the particular 'one graviton' level where quantum theory > becomes overwhelmed by macroscopic effects. > > > The acceleration of the nucler decay process in LENR is an experimental > resullt that will answer this issue. > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> How gtavity causes time to slow down. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penrose_interpretation >> >> Gravity delays the transition between entrangles and decoherent states. >> It is this destrution of coherence that results in the arrow of time. In a >> BEC time stands still. When a BEC is detroyed, time accelerates. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Clocks on the Space Shuttle >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle> ran slightly slower than >>> reference clocks on Earth, while clocks on GPS >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPS> and Galileo >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_(satellite_navigation)> satellites >>> run slightly faster.[1] >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation#cite_note-Ashby-1> Such >>> time dilation has been repeatedly demonstrated (seeexperimental >>> confirmation >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation#Experimental_confirmation> >>> below), >>> for instance by small disparities inatomic clocks >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_clocks> on Earth and in space, >>> even though both clocks work perfectly (it is not a mechanical >>> malfunction). The laws of nature are such that time itself (i.e. >>> spacetime <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime>) will bend due to >>> differences in either gravity <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity> >>> or velocity <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velocity> – each of which >>> affects time in different ways.[2] >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation#cite_note-HSWTime-2>[3] >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation#cite_note-EdLu-3> >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> There is a view arount in quantum physics that time does not exist on >>>> the atomic level. Time may be a consequence of entangelment of particles. >>>> In the macro world in which we live, gravitation distroys entanglemet since >>>> an entangled particle when it moves far from its entangled partners will be >>>> rendered decoherent. Time will advance for this far ranging wonderer due >>>> to the changes imposed on the particle by gravity. Gravity is the force >>>> that shapes the world in which we live. >>>> >>>> Time speeds up close to the earth because gravity is stronger there but >>>> time increases when the particle is moved farther from the earth. >>>> >>>> Ashby, Neil (2003). "Relativity in the Global Positioning System" >>>> <http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2003-1/download/lrr-2003-1Color.pdf> >>>> ). *Living Reviews in Relativity >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_Reviews_in_Relativity>* *6*: >>>> >>>> But when the system of particles remains withing the same small local >>>> volume, time does not flow, it may even run backward and undue events that >>>> has already occured. >>>> >>>> The take away, Special relitivity may not be applicable to interactions >>>> between atoms and subatonic particles. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Roarty, Francis X < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Matt, >>>>> >>>>> The fields are all quickly starting to grow together..[snip] lithium >>>>> ions to chemically break the metal oxide catalyst into smaller and smaller >>>>> pieces."Breaking down metal oxide into tiny particles increases its >>>>> surface >>>>> area and exposes lots of ultra-small, interconnected grain boundaries that >>>>> become active sites for the water-splitting catalytic reaction," [/snip] >>>>> lithium and nickel may be a super activator in the dogbone as well >>>>> ..making >>>>> the powder particles and any oxides smaller, and Jones has trotted out >>>>> iron >>>>> as one of the possible candidates for the secret sauce. >>>>> >>>>> Way back when I first came to vortex I trotted out the idea that >>>>> hydrinos are actually relativistic like the 05 paper by Jan Naudts >>>>> suggested and that the effect could be NESTED to the point where hydrogen >>>>> loads into supressive cavities smaller than the hydrogens own atomic size >>>>> [TARTUS like :_)] from the external observers perspective while appearing >>>>> normal to their own local but time dilated observer. I think these >>>>> effects >>>>> normally self destruct in the presence of oxides but this latest discovery >>>>> is activated in situ by the lithium while submerged which sounds like the >>>>> same process occurring in the dogbone when the lithium wets the reactor >>>>> walls. It is also why I am convinced these tests have to brought online >>>>> with matched drives and heat sinking to exploit OU ….to quote the song >>>>> “you >>>>> aint seen nothing yet” I believe most of these destroyed reactors >>>>> represent >>>>> self destructs with far higher COP than we have time to harness ..seems to >>>>> me we need better- faster heat sinking before we even learn how much power >>>>> is really under the hood! >>>>> >>>>> Fran >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Mats Lewan [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 25, 2015 7:29 AM >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>> *Subject:* EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Single-catalyst water splitter from >>>>> Stanford produces clean-burning hydrogen 24/7 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://news.stanford.edu/news/2015/june/water-splitter-catalyst-062315.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> (No big surprises). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Mats >>>>> >>>>> www.animpossibleinvention.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
