However, Maly & Vavra, and Naudts predict the lowest DDL state as giving up 510 keV to be reached, not 3.56 keV. That is 2 orders of magnitude lower energy for their DDL solution than what you are describing. Where has all the energy gone in this calculation?
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Robin, for the record, can we list the smallest theoretical state of > hydrogen redundancy for your model, Mills' model, DDL, and Arbab's model … > in terms of mass-energy. > > We can start with the most literal case, where there are 136 Hydrino > energy levels below 1/1 (1/2 - 1/137), and the ionization energy required > is a whole integer multiple of 27.2 eV, where the integer is 2...137. In > this case, 27.2 eV x 137 = 3726.4 eV. > > 1) 27.2 eV x 137 = 3726.4 eV. > > 2) DDL observed (as dark matter) 3.56 keV > > 3) > > 4) > > Etc. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > > In reply to Jones Beene's message: > > Hi, > > >On vortex, many different variations exist on the theme of f/H or > > >"dense hydrogen clusters" (even as being identical to dark matter). > > > > > >These are different from Mills' theory to varying degrees, despite > > >similarities. Miley, Hora, Lawandy and Meulenberg have delved in with > > >insight and Robin has another version, closer to Mills. > > > > > >Here is something that has not been mentioned before - AFAIK. "The > > >Fractional Hydrogen Atom: A Paradigm for Astrophysical Phenomena" Author- > I. > > >Arbab Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of > > >Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan. > > His "protonium" is actually very close to the smallest state in my model. > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
