Bob,

 

The 510 keV of Maly & Vavra is almost certainly incorrect, but there are a 
number of values in the range of several hundred keV which represent the total 
energy which can be released in 136 steps. Robin has mentioned his value around 
255207+eV but that is almost certainly wrong if FQHE is the correct criterion. 
The principal series of such fractions in FQHE are 1/3, 2/5, 3/7, 2/3, 3/5, 
3/7… but not ½. 

 

This large value is a net release of all the steps, however, and does not 
represent the end state vis-à-vis adjoining levels which can be in real time. 
That is what I am after – the end value which can cycle as an ongoing emission. 
The end state cannot be the full mass-energy of the electron, but could be 
related to the fractions which are seen in the FQHE. With dark matter, the 
lowest stable orbit is assumed to have been reached sometime in the distant 
past, billions of years ago (for most of the mass of dark matter).

 

What is seen now – in literally hundreds of galaxies, so it assumed to be dark 
matter, is the widespread signal at 3.65 KeV. THIS IS FACT, not theory.

 

Everything else is open to interpretation, but evidence is quite strong that 
this is the signature of dark matter. This signal – in the context of Mills 
hydrino can be attributed to the cycling between two of the lower states – for 
instance, when a gravity wave passes through a cloud of dark matter. Although 
there is lots dark matter, it is assumed to be the form of a relatively diffuse 
cloud.

 

 

From: Bob Higgins 

 

However, Maly & Vavra, and Naudts predict the lowest DDL state as giving up 510 
keV to be reached, not 3.56 keV.  That is 2 orders of magnitude lower energy 
for their DDL solution than what you are describing.  Where has all the energy 
gone in this calculation?

 

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:

Robin, for the record, can we list the smallest theoretical state of hydrogen 
redundancy for your model, Mills' model, DDL, and Arbab's model … in terms of 
mass-energy.

We can start with the most literal case, where there are 136 Hydrino energy 
levels below 1/1 (1/2 - 1/137), and the ionization energy required is a whole 
integer multiple of 27.2 eV, where the integer is 2...137. In this case, 27.2 
eV x 137 = 3726.4 eV. 

1) 27.2 eV x 137 = 3726.4 eV. 

2) DDL observed (as dark matter) 3.56 keV

3)

4)

Etc.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 

In reply to  Jones Beene's message:

Hi,

>On vortex, many different variations exist on the theme of f/H or 

>"dense hydrogen clusters" (even as being identical to dark matter).

> 

>These are different from Mills' theory to varying degrees, despite 

>similarities. Miley, Hora, Lawandy and Meulenberg have delved in with 

>insight and Robin has another version, closer to Mills.

> 

>Here is something that has not been mentioned before - AFAIK. "The 

>Fractional Hydrogen Atom: A Paradigm for Astrophysical Phenomena" Author- I.

>Arbab  Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of 

>Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.

His "protonium" is actually very close to the smallest state in my model.

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

 <http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html> 
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html

 

Reply via email to