Have the double slit been verified for neutrons? Just curious, Mills have arguments for photons and charged particles as far as I understand.
Regards Stefan On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Any quantum particle obeys the born rule which is a reflection of the wave > nature of particles and atoms. Richard Feynman calls this sumation over > all hystories. If hydrinos can produce the same results as QM, then > hydrinos theory must apply to photons and atoms and neutrons and > protons,,,on and on. Confirm or deny, > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_integral_formulation > > On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> If you read the link you see that the QM predictions of intensities and >> Mills is essentially the same so for this experiment >> there is an overlap. >> >> Regards >> Stefan >> >> On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Does the Mills theory explain the Born rule for two or more slits? >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Born_rule >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I know that people here challenge Randy Mills theory to explain the >>>> result of the double slit experiment. Turns out that BLP has published >>>> their hypothesis there for you to read. Consider reading, >>>> >>>> http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory-2/theory/double-slit/ >>>> >>>> General remark. Quantum mechanics would probably be considered a >>>> crackpot theory today if it where not for this experiments that proposed >>>> that particles as both a particle property and a wave like property >>>> interpreted as a quantum mechanical probability wave. As Faymann said : all >>>> QM can be derived from this experiment. >>>> >>>> Enjoy! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
