OK, this is how the 200-1000 Hz signal is propogated http://www.nwas.org/committees/avnwinterwx/doppler_weather_radar_overview.htm
A large parabolic dish antenna works well. On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:29 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > It is up to those that propose problems such as you are doing to prove > that the transmitters are a big problem for society. Some people would > also be concerned about the safety of air transportation without radar or > radio guidance. Are you ready to give up on your cellular radios and > other modern devices? > > You are going to have a difficult time attempting to eliminate radio and > radar from the world! > > Please show me how the 200 to 1000 Hz signal is going to be radiated by a > typical radar antenna system. I can tell you that you will not be able to > show that and I am confident that you can not answer that question in an > accepted engineering manner. Until you can do so, you should not keep > repeating something that all of us radio engineers know is inaccurate. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2015 1:56 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Possible cause for coral reefs dying... > > How many dead fish do we have to have and dead birds falling from the > sky to have before you sparkies understand your mistake? > > http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/01/12/florida-2/ > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:48 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> > wrote: > >> The radar RF signal is not being rectified by the water into a DC >> current like your chart is assuming. The signal is actually reflected from >> the surface layers with extremely small penetration. The pulse rate has >> nothing to do with the high frequency RF reflection behavior for a typical >> installation. >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> >> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2015 9:50 am >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Possible cause for coral reefs dying... >> >> Low frequency pulse. >> >> Also, we are not communicating with the marine life and coral reef, the >> evidence is mounting that 2 terrawatts of effective isotropic radiated >> power (EIRP) in a local area scattered by the overhead atmosphere is mildly >> shocking the marine life through electromagnetic induction and conduction >> through the salt water near the surface as it "grounds out" into the ocean. >> You can't fool mother nature sort of thing. >> >> Here is a model of induced electrical currents in seawater surface >> around just one ship's antennas. Now imagine 27 high power coastal based >> radars/antennas and 45 warship radars/antennas in one area. >> >> >> http://darkmattersalot.com/2015/05/14/how-cousteau-and-noaa-killed-the-reef/ >> >> >> Effects of Electrical Current* on the Body [3] >> <http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2002-123/2002-123f.html#end3> *Current* >> *Reaction* 1 milliamp Just a faint tingle. 5 milliamps Slight shock >> felt. Disturbing, but not painful. Most people can “let go.” However, >> strong involuntary movements can cause injuries. 6-25 milliamps (women)† >> 9-30 milliamps (men) Painful shock. Muscular control is lost. This is >> the range where “freezing currents” start. It may not be possible to “let >> go.” 50-150 milliamps Extremely painful shock, respiratory arrest >> (breathing stops), severe muscle contractions. Flexor muscles may cause >> holding on; extensor muscles may cause intense pushing away. Death is >> possible. 1,000-4,300 milliamps (1-4.3 amps) Ventricular fibrillation >> (heart pumping action not rhythmic) occurs. Muscles contract; nerve damage >> occurs. Death is likely. 10,000 milliamps (10 amps) Cardiac arrest and >> severe burns occur. Death is probable. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 8:43 AM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Low pulsed frequency is a contradiction in terms. >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 7:01 AM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Except low pulsed frequencies >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, July 7, 2015, James Bowery < jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:42 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint < >>>>> zeropo...@charter.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> This is primarily meant for fellow Vort, ChemEng (Stewart), but >>>>>> some others may have an interest… >>>>>> >>>>>> Stewart, I think I may have a cause for your hypothesis re: a link >>>>>> between our modern radar systems and the dying of coral reefs… >>>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>>> Time to break out the tin-foil hats??? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No need. Salt water shields against EM penetration. >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
