Marine life on the North Shore of Kauai, HI: https://www.facebook.com/honulilley/media_set?set=a.10152814052996556.1073742148.574581555&type=3&pnref=story
Electrons/charged ions will discharge along pointed surfaces, decaying them (that is why airplane wings have wicks on tips/trailing surfaces to discharge electrical buildup) Spotted reef fish turning black and fins rotting off Sharks going belly up for no known reason Shark fins showing signs of strong electrical discharge Turtle flippers/shell shwing signs of decaying along edges and getting eaten to the bone by cleaning fish Coral reef 70-80% dead polyps for 10 miles CaCO3 skeleton of 4 million year old coral reef is disassociating and suspended in the seawater. Only one small river discharges in area with small amount of mud. pH is normal in river as well as chemicals within limits Kauai is a remote island with less tourists than others Big Island coral reef is doing fine 30 million pulsed watts of radars atop the hill in North Kauai, ~ 2 terrwatts EIRP Lots of military warships/wargames off North shore, including electronic warfare/directed energy weapons Party on dudes. Stewart On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 11:36 AM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > JoJo sent me a message to post, so I will post. We will agree to disagree > about the radars/antennas near seawater. I don't disagree electrodes can > stimulate growth, they can also kill it. > > http://fishshocker.net/ > > Stewart > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: <jojoiznar...@gmail.com> > Date: Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:26 AM > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Possible cause for coral reefs dying... > To: cheme...@gmail.com > > > Stewart, this is Jojo Jaro. > > I have been following your posting on vortex regarding your hypothesis > that electricity is killing the corals. I believe you are wrong on that > and you are barking up the wrong tree. > > If anything, mild electricity you documented from radars etc., would help > corals grow faster rather than kill them. > > Google “Biorock” and “mineral accretion” were they zap 2 electrodes under > seawater with 2V up to 12 V of electricity to stimulate coral growth. The > corals, oysters, fish and other marine creatures get attracted to the > cathode and grow profusely up to 10 time faster. Electricity at the levels > you documented will increase coral growth, not kill them. > > My own computations for my onshore Pearl oyster farm indicates that > zapping with 1.3 v would create a current of about .001 A which would not > only be harmless to pearl oysters (Pinctada Maxima sp), but also stimulate > faster growth. Multiple studies have documented this. Just google. > > Please copy and paste this email on Vortex so that people don’t waste time > barking up the wrong tree. > > The simpler reason for coral death is plain old pollution and > eutrophication of coastal waters. Have you done a correlation study of > coral deaths versus pollution levels in said waters. I believe that if you > do, you will find that there would be a strong correlation, much stronger > than your radar correlation. Could it simply be that radar station > locations you documented tend to be located in coastal populated areas > which would tend to pollute the coastal seawater? > > > Jojo > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 11:29 AM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Stray electrical currents from electromagnetic induction are an ongoing >> problem >> in saltwater aquariums - diseased fish and marine life. >> http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1982006 >> >> In Kauai, the North shore reef fish are turning black and some of the >> sharks are going belly up near the radar stations. The fins of the green >> sea turtles and sharks in the area are getting eaten away. >> >> It is not the voltage potential that gets you, but the induced electrical >> currents as the potential seeks ground, if there is one. >> >> The ocean/seawater makes a very good ground. Many receiving antennas >> near the coast run their ground into the ocean. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_plane >> To function as a ground plane, the conducting surface must be at least a >> quarter of the wavelength <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavelength> (*λ*/4) >> of the radio waves in size. In lower frequency >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency> antennas, such as the mast >> radiators <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mast_radiator> used for >> broadcast antennas, the Earth itself (or a body of water such as a salt >> marsh or ocean) is used as a ground plane. >> >> Small waves at surface of ocean breaking over shallow reef also act as >> antennas to capture higher frequency EMF >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tIZUhu21sQ >> >> >> Stewart >> >> >> On Tuesday, July 7, 2015, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. <hoyt-stea...@cox.net> >> wrote: >> >>> This must be done "blind" but even then, the "experimenter effect" ( >>> Marylyn Schlitz) would override the results ( Experimenter effect ). >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* James Bowery [mailto:jabow...@gmail.com] >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 7, 2015 7:07 AM >>> *To:* vortex-l >>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Possible cause for coral reefs dying... >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks for the numbers. >>> >>> >>> >>> This should be relatively straight forward to test: >>> >>> >>> >>> Set up two salt water aquariums supporting comparable coral >>> populations. Run them for a year or so to see they are stable. Then >>> subject one of them to low frequency EM radiation. >>> >>> >>> >>> PS: What I mean contraction in terms is that "pulse" implies high >>> frequency components and, indeed, is usually illustrated by time >>> differential on a square wave to filter out the low frequency components. >>> However, your point is well taken -- a short duration transmission of a >>> high power low frequency signal will penetrate salt water -- with a very >>> drastic reduction in power with depth, as your numbers show. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 8:50 AM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Low frequency pulse. >>> >>> >>> >>> Also, we are not communicating with the marine life and coral reef, the >>> evidence is mounting that 2 terrawatts of effective isotropic radiated >>> power (EIRP) in a local area scattered by the overhead atmosphere is mildly >>> shocking the marine life through electromagnetic induction and conduction >>> through the salt water near the surface as it "grounds out" into the ocean. >>> You can't fool mother nature sort of thing. >>> >>> >>> >>> Here is a model of induced electrical currents in seawater surface >>> around just one ship's antennas. Now imagine 27 high power coastal based >>> radars/antennas and 45 warship radars/antennas in one area. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> http://darkmattersalot.com/2015/05/14/how-cousteau-and-noaa-killed-the-reef/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Effects of Electrical Current* on the Body [3] >>> <http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2002-123/2002-123f.html#end3> >>> >>> *Current* >>> >>> *Reaction* >>> >>> 1 milliamp >>> >>> Just a faint tingle. >>> >>> 5 milliamps >>> >>> Slight shock felt. Disturbing, but not painful. Most people can “let >>> go.” However, strong involuntary movements can cause injuries. >>> >>> 6-25 milliamps (women)† >>> 9-30 milliamps (men) >>> >>> Painful shock. Muscular control is lost. This is the range where >>> “freezing currents” start. It may not be possible to “let go.” >>> >>> 50-150 milliamps >>> >>> Extremely painful shock, respiratory arrest (breathing stops), severe >>> muscle contractions. Flexor muscles may cause holding on; extensor muscles >>> may cause intense pushing away. Death is possible. >>> >>> 1,000-4,300 milliamps (1-4.3 amps) >>> >>> Ventricular fibrillation (heart pumping action not rhythmic) occurs. >>> Muscles contract; nerve damage occurs. Death is likely. >>> >>> 10,000 milliamps (10 amps) >>> >>> Cardiac arrest and severe burns occur. Death is probable. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 8:43 AM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Low pulsed frequency is a contradiction in terms. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 7:01 AM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Except low pulsed frequencies >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, July 7, 2015, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:42 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> This is primarily meant for fellow Vort, ChemEng (Stewart), but some >>> others may have an interest… >>> >>> >>> >>> Stewart, I think I may have a cause for your hypothesis re: a link >>> between our modern radar systems and the dying of coral reefs… >>> >>> ... >>> >>> Time to break out the tin-foil hats??? >>> >>> >>> >>> No need. Salt water shields against EM penetration. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> >>> >>> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus >>> <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> protection is active. >>> >>> >
