From: CB Sites Ø
Ø Beautiful work. I've always admired Claytor's work and I think it easily demonstrates to the lay physicist that there are low level physical conditions were fusion is demonstrable. Yes. This is excellent work, but it has now evolved well beyond palladium, which he admits is not anywhere close to the favored nickel alloy - in terms of tritium production. Brillouin in never mentioned, so does anyone know why the subject heat mentions them? This is not normal hot fusion. There are almost no neutrons. And it is not cold fusion in one sense – as these are massive electron pulses. It is DIFFUSION DRIVEN. This should be categorized as different from LENR in the same way as other warm fusion reactions like the FUSOR are – not hot, not cold but colder than hotter, if a choice had to be made. Plus – some tritium is seen without deuterium – meaning a three body hydrogen reaction the culprit … or … else f/H2 + f/H which is arguably a two-body reaction (but is out of Calytor’s vocabulary, as it is Millsean). The good news is that by eliminating radon – this work is rock solid proof of LENR, and given the implications of finding tritium in nickel alloy at 1000 times the earlier rates (back when palladium was used) – and in finding no helium, it also detracts from that past work in a subtle implied way. Ø Think asteroid or comet hitting Jupiter, it could be causing a fusion trail as it sinks into the charged high pressured atmosphere. Metallic meteors might give some tritium signatures when they fall into the jovian atmosphere. Well the metallic asteroids would need to be loaded with lots of deuterium in order to see tritium. However, Claytor does not eliminate other types of fusion, he merely sticks with the kind which is easiest to dobcment as being rock-solid – which is tritium. Jones
