Bob,

 

The ultradense species could be too problematic to manufacture in situ 
especially in an automobile where weight is a concern. And really, if the 
chemical energy is high, there is no need to look beyond it. 

 

Apparently the rate of production is low in terms of mass of IRH per unit of 
catalyst per unit of time. This is basically 2D chemistry.

 

For instance, if one ton of catalyst produces 10 grams of IRH per hour – this 
is not going to work for onboard automotive uses - but could still be 
economically made in a factory, since the catalyst is cheap – basically 
glorified iron ore. 

 

BTW – isn’t it true that Rossi has admitted that his fuel must be “prepared” 
ahead of time, which could mean that he too is densifying hydrogen, prior to 
loading? He may not realize it, but in the process of treating his nickel, AR 
could be loading it with IRH.

 

Anyway - here is a slight variation on what you are suggesting. If Holmlid is 
correct on the 10x chemical energy of the species, it probably makes more sense 
to manufacture it in a dedicated facility, and convert the ICE to burn it as if 
it was hydrogen – even mixing it with hydrogen, so it ignites easier. 

 

One big (HUGE) difference of Holmlid from Mills’ concept is that the excess 
energy is not seen when the species is made (Mills’ claim) – but is seen when 
the condensed hydrogen is reinflated back to hydrogen (or reacted in a nuclear 
reaction).

 

Even if far more energy is available in a nuclear pathway, that could be too 
complicated and unreliable for the highway, and especially if there are 
accumulated transmutation products. When everything is considered, it might be 
more cost effective to provide the simple and more robust chemical energy of 
IRH only.

 

Because the chemical binding energy of IRH is about 50 eV according to Holmlid, 
it would be hard to ignite but could be mixed with H2 for that purpose. 

 

From: Bob Higgins 

 

It would be interesting to consider, the use of a Holmlid condensation of 
hydrogen in conjunction with a mechanical engine.  Suppose we had initially an 
empty piston and cylinder with the piston at top dead center and having a 
surface designed to support a Holmlid dense hydrogen film.  The intake port 
opens and the port has a Holmlid catalyst.  As the piston falls, hydrogen is 
drawn through the intake port and through the hydrogen catalyst to draw 
hydrogen prepared to form an ultra-dense layer into the cylinder.  The 
ultra-dense hydrogen layer forms on the piston top while it cycles down and 
back up.  As the piston reaches TDC, an electrical discharge occurs causing the 
condensate to fail and be released as H1 and H2 gas - at a much larger volume.  
The sudden high pressure forces the piston down and the the flywheel keeps it 
headed back up.  The exhaust port opens up and the H2 gas is pushed out easily 
(perhaps into a reservoir).  At TDC, the exhaust port closes and the intake 
port opens to admit more catalyzed hydrogen to form a new ultra-dense hydrogen 
layer on the piston.

 

The cycle is making the ultra-dense hydrogen layer and then triggering its 
expansion into ordinary hydrogen gas - a huge expansion.

 

Bob Higgins

 

 

Reply via email to