Also see http://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.2261v1.pdf
Optical analogue of spontaneous symmetry breaking induced by tachyon condensation in amplifying plasmonic arrays We study analytically and numerically an optical analogue of tachyon condensation in amplifying plasmonic arrays. Optical propagation is modeled through coupled-mode equations, which in the continuous limit can be converted into a nonlinear one-dimensional Dirac-like equation for fermionic particles with imaginary mass, i.e. fermionic tachyons. We demonstrate that the vacuum state is unstable and acquires an expectation value with broken chiral symmetry, corresponding to the homogeneous nonlinear stationary solution of the system. The quantum field theory analogue of this process is the condensation of unstable fermionic tachyons into massive particles. This paves the way for using amplifying plasmonic arrays as a classical laboratory for spontaneous symmetry breaking effects in quantum field theory. On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Mesons come from tachyion condensation inside a SPP black hole. The SPP > holds energy of 1,000,000 GeV give or take. EMF captured by the SPP is > reformatted into a quark based subatomic based discharge: Mesons. A tachyon > condensate is broken chiral symmetry of the magnetic force. > > See > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon_condensation > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Stephen Cooke <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Yup it's certainly astonishing if true. >> >> If a Nucleon is disintegrating this way, I wonder how it still can meet >> conservation rules. In order to form pions it implies quark anti quark >> pairs with combinations of up and down quarks are formed from a nucleon. In >> effect the equivalent quarks for a anti nucleon need to be produced. If >> they interact with another nucleon I suppose they may change transfer >> energy to that nucleon and change the nucleon type and conserve spin etc >> somehow to maintain conservation states otherwise I suppose the >> conservation might be taken up by the kind of produced lepton and neutrinos >> produced. I'm curious how it can work I suppose we will need to wait to see >> the of their theory. >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 23 okt. 2015, at 16:54, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> *From:* Stephen Cooke >> >> Ø That nucleons may actually disintegrate is nothing short of >> astonishing! Is this what they are actually saying? Did they really observe >> such huge amounts of energy? >> >> Yes precisely. This is why it will be more controversial than cold >> fusion until replicated. Many observers were left in a state of >> amazement, but … all of this was in the prior papers. We talked about it >> here earlier. >> >> Sometimes you just have to hear it directly from a credible person >> instead of seeing it in a paper. Ólafsson is a tall, handsome Nordic >> fellow - not as charismatic as McKubre, but some of that comes with age. He >> is very believable. >> >> Ø >> >> Ø 900 MeV is close to the rest mass of a neutron (939 MeV) and >> proton (938 MeV), Half the mass of the Deutron Nucleus! >> >> Yes – it is the entire mass of a nucleon which is being converted into >> energy. I should not have rounded this off. Much of that energy will be >> lost to neutrinos but there will be gammas. >> >> Ø >> >> Ø When they 900 MeV is released I see 3 possible meanings for this: >> >> 1) Did they imply total disintegration of one of the nucleons to >> Pions to Muons to electrons and neutrinos and gamma? >> >> Yes. They see mesons first, then pions, then muons and finally electrons. >> They have a detector. I think the skepticism from other Physicists will >> focus on the detector. Ideally other detectors should be used as well. I >> hope the slides will be published soon as this would require a lone time to >> try to explain, otherwise. >> >> >> 2) If so could it be the just the Neutron or Proton or either one >> that can disintegrate? >> >> Either one or both together. >> >> Ø >> >> Ø Which ever the case its astonishing amount of energy to release >> in one reaction almost up there with matter antimatter annihilation. >> >> If they can confirm this finding using a neutrino detector – that would >> go a long way. I walked away from this with the feeling that a new door >> is opening in the world of alternative energy. They may not have it >> completely right, but this could represent the final hurdle in the >> process started in 1989 (or earlier). >> >> It is too bad for mainstream physics that most of them have they missed >> the boat on this. If Holmlid is accurate, it makes the billions spent on >> the LHC and the Higgs closer to self-promoting fraud than to the >> efficient advancement of science. Unlike the situation in 1989, it will >> be much harder to erect obstacles. >> >> Let us hope that this is not a Pandora’s box which is opening. >> >> >> >> >
