Holmlid says that the the reaction is delayed by 26ns for deuterium and 52 ns for protium. This means that the reaction is produced by a decay product of the K mesons. The 10 billion kaons are produced simultaneously. Positrons are seen but no gamma. This is important. This means that the mechanism that suppresses of thermalizes the gamma radiation exists AFTER the hydrogen Rydberg matter is blasted apart. The Rydberg matter is not causative.
This also means that more electrons are seen then positions like what happened in the big bang in respect to CPT violation. Positrons were seen a long distance away from the site of the reactions. This means that the gamma thermalization extends outward meters from the site of the reaction. How long does it take to reenergize this process? How long do we need to wait before another laser shot produces similar results. Both Mills and Papp were able to repeat their reaction is milliseconds. Can Holmlid do the same? Does this reaction still need hydrogen Rydberg matter to exist after the first laser shot? Holmlid said that it takes weeks to build up the Rydberg matter. But both Mills and Papp got repeatable results in milliseconds. Does this mean that the case of the reaction persists to thermalize radiation and stabilize radioactive isotopes long after the Rydberg matter is gone? We are at a stage in LENR where Niels Bohr was doing his exploration of the structure of the atom. Holmlid needs to modify his experimental processes to get as much info out of his experiment as he can. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Well if Kaons are present on the up side we always thought something > strange was going on in this process😉. > > Although energetically there is enough rest mass in Deuterium to produce a > Kaon through some kind of low energy or collective trigger for the nucleons > to trigger can it account for the formation of these quarks? > > If it is not possible this way but on the other hand they are present it > would indicate maybe that the right combination of quarks and anti quarks > are produced to form all the mesons observed from high energy excitation in > one place. > > This I think is consistent with your SPP analogue black hole Hadron > evaporation idea? > > As an alternative approach to the analogue black hole idea, for a meson to > form in a single bound place I suppose that meson combinations could be > generated in a nucleus. If a nucleus somehow has enough extra energy to > generate a quark neutral over all combination of mesons. I wonder if this > also true if a nucleon or nucleon pair is destroyed in the process. As well > as an energizing source (perhaps a laser, phonon resonance effect or > magnetic stimulation from SPP), I suppose a nucleus of sufficient binding > energy would be required. It seems Deuterium it self does not have any > where near the binding energy to hold a pion let alone combinations of > pions or kaons. So if a single nucleus is required to generate complete > mesons this implies heavier nuclei are required at least of sufficient > binding energy to hold a meson pair before being released from or quantum > tunneling out of the nucleus. > > If we assume 8MeV binding energy per nucleon then perhaps we need a > nucleus of atomic mass of 36 (heavier than Sulphur) to manifest +/- pion > pairs for example. For kaon pairs however, much heavier nuclei would be > implicated. I'm not sure if these are present in the fuel but I suppose > platinum would be heavy enough. > > So perhaps as I think you have said in the past the UDD is providing a > kind of magnetic resonance to other individual nuclei. If these are heavier > nuclei perhaps they can be excited to a state where these meson pairs can > be manifested. > > If the accumulation of energy in the nucleus is slow perhaps the mesons > would be ejected as soon as the are formed with minimal energy as soon they > can tunnel out of the nucleus. I suppose - mesons would form pionic and > kaonic atoms and maybe the + pion interact with a neutron to form a proton, > otherwise they would decay following the chain mentioned by Holmlid. > > It might be still difficult to account for Kaons using the above approach > if so we are left with: > > Nucleon or nucleon pair disintegration,(perhaps in ultra dense material) > then a trigger needs to be identified. > > Nucleon annihilation followed by particle generation from the energy > released. > > Axils SSP black hole analogue and Hadron evaporation. > > High energy nucleon impacts or fusion events. In which case we would > expect more radiation if I understand correctly. > > On 26 Oct 2015, at 08:03, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > K−, negatively charged (containing a strange quark and an up antiquark) > has mass 493.667±0.013 MeV and mean lifetime (1.2384±0.0024)×10−8 s. > K+ (antiparticle of above) positively charged (containing an up quark and > a strange antiquark) must (by CPT invariance) have mass and lifetime equal > to that of K−. > > The mass difference is 0.032±0.090 MeV, consistent with zero. The > difference in lifetime is (0.11±0.09)×10−8 s. What's weird is that two > different quarks types are produced out of nothing. You just don't find > strange quarks in ordinary matter. > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> in physical cosmology <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_cosmology> >> , *baryogenesis* is the generic term for the hypothetical physical >> processes that produced an asymmetry >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetry>(imbalance) between baryons >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baryon> and antibaryons produced in the very >> early universe <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang>. The baryonic >> matter <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter> that remains today, >> following the baryonic-antibaryonic matter annihilation, makes up the >> universe <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universe>. >> >> LENR could be responsible for the past and ongoing production of matter >> in the universe in violation of CPT and that negative matter ( >> antibaryons) is being sent back in time. >> >> We see excess electrons pop into existence in LENR reactions. Could LENR >> be the GOD reaction? In point of fact, Holmlid is producing electrons from >> nothing in his experiment. Don't get excited, we are just talking here. >> >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> CPT THEOREM C(harge) -P(arity=reflection) -T(ime reversal) INVARIANCE is >>> a property of any quantum field theory in Flat space times which respects: >>> (i) Locality, (ii) Unitarity and (iii) Lorentz Symmetry. >>> >>> Holmlid is producing neutral K mesons. This particle demonstrates CP >>> violation, >>> >>> The discovery of CP violation in 1964 in the decays of neutral kaons >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaon> resulted in the Nobel Prize in >>> Physics <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize_in_Physics> in 1980 >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize_in_Physics#1980s> for its >>> discoverers James Cronin <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Cronin> >>> and Val Fitch <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Val_Fitch>. >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CP_violation >>> >>> Who can say why LENR produces neutral K mesons? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
